Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 212 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#false#flag#run#career#quitting#wonder#operations#market#employees#quit

Discussion (10 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Avicebronabout 1 hour ago
This feels like a performance designed to launch this guys career in some "ai safety thinktank".
aprilthird202110 minutes ago
If he really did work there for the last 3 years doing what he said, he probably doesn't need a new career
ramesh315 minutes ago
Quitting Anthropic is the new dropping out of Stanford
sscaryterryabout 2 hours ago
I wonder how many of these are false flag operations. Pushing for AI regulation, after the market has been captured by the 2 top dogs.
no-name-here6 minutes ago
I.e. employees are choosing to quit their jobs to run a false flag operation?
blablabla123about 2 hours ago
> I wonder how many of these are false flag operations.

If I may ask, could you elaborate on what you mean?

wjncabout 2 hours ago
Capture a market. Become big enough to jump hurdles XYZ due to scale and amount of, say, lawyers and compliance officers you can field. Then push for more compliance. It’s effectively a moat and one of the most durable kind since lawmakers aren’t very agile. It also opens a second front (first front being: product) to go up against newcomers. Kindly point out to the regulatory agencies that they are not compliant and demand enforcement due to “equal playing field”.

To make this point concrete: KYC in banks in Europe is on a scale of 1000s FTE per bank. No newcomer can ever comply with KYC the way big banks have implemented this by pure meat. Trouble ensue for all newcomer. That’s a moat!

sscaryterryabout 2 hours ago
See the second sentence.
no-name-here5 minutes ago
The idea being that the employee(s) quit in order to run the false flag? Are their other historical examples of employees quitting to run false flags?
nairboonabout 1 hour ago