Chess.com Leak Exposes 7.3M Users, Evidence Points to Scraping

Shank•1 day ago

> Every record has gam_audiences and audiences_member_of populated, Google Ad Manager audience segments, with values like coach-nudge experiment groups, trial eligibility, lapsed-user cohorts and rating-band targeting.

It sure seems like the evidence doesn't point to scraping to me.

happosai•1 day ago

Have I been pwned reports 99% of email addresses from chess.com leak were already in their database. Rather strong indicator that the Hacker scraped an API with a list of email addresses.

https://infosec.exchange/@haveibeenpwned/117263977537458510

emodendroket•1 day ago

I'm assuming they're basing this on the no-passwords part.

specproc•about 19 hours ago

Lichess.org is an internet gem. No ads, no subs, incredible performance, low-toxicity, fully featured, free API, European.

Far superior to chess.com in all regards. If you're still on chess.com, make this your opportunity to switch. You won't regret it.

Mydayyy•about 10 hours ago

When I started playing online chess, which was around a year before the hype came with corona, I checked out both websites chess.com and Lichess. I very quickly decided to use Lichess since it just appeared superior in all aspects and it, in my opinion, look way better.

Almost all of the people I met who play chess prefer chess.com and I just don't understand it. I just never managed to warm up with that site

stavros•about 18 hours ago

I'm loving that "European" is a selling point now, but yes, agreed. Lichess is a gem.

sidrag22•1 day ago

> The data had been pulled by abusing the platform’s find-friends feature

Sounds like the find-friends feature shouldn't allow access to the majority of that data unless the "friend" accepts, don't think the "scraper" got 7mil accepts just because they had access to emails... To me this is 100% a breach, even more so because its already happened once years ago to 700k, and they changed nothing to prevent it.

samus•1 day ago

It might very well be possible that there were API endpoints that exposed way too much information. I also think that this wouldn't qualify as "scraping".

nilslindemann•1 day ago

I just logged in to delete my chess.com account, got a message: "This account is closed, please log in with your e-Mail to reactivate". No word by them having been hacked.

dwroberts•about 23 hours ago

Worth noting this was reported back in August, it’s not new

Lucasoato•1 day ago

I just got a message from an Hacker: "You seriously just played London opening as white and King Indian defense as black for the last 3 months?"

Btw I hate that chess.com puts game reviews under their most expensive plan, I ain't paying so much for something I can get in lichess for free.

gregorygoc•1 day ago

Exactly, chess.com is at value extraction phase. Lichess is much better platform now.

mitxela•about 24 hours ago

Wasn't this literally always the case and the very reason lichess was created? And yet it remains #2.

demibabs•about 24 hours ago

Some battles are won at the domain registry.

a_c•about 23 hours ago

I only started playing less than a year ago. I paid for one year because of game review to improve my game. Didn't know lichess exist, but I'm not paying for a second year for sure

m00x•1 day ago

uh oh. If my ELO gets back to my friends I'm going to be very embarrassed.

MiroslavPokorny•1 day ago

Hack or scraping, both are equally bad.

TheSpacerr•1 day ago

Basically our data is free.

ed_mercer•1 day ago

email? Is a user's email up for grabs just like that?

efilife•about 24 hours ago

What's the forum shown in the screenshot?

unixhero•1 day ago

Is scraping wrong that, is the question.

Chess.com Leak Exposes 7.3M Users, Evidence Points to Scraping

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion (24 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews