Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 172 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#https#article#xai#money#profitable#spacex#costs#web#archive#www

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

justincliftabout 1 hour ago
* https://web.archive.org/web/20260414235001/https://www.theat...

* https://archive.md/w1p99

Seems like a weird article though, with some inaccuracy in key data:

> The company is in fact relatively small and losing money.

Whereas it's widely reported to be profitable:

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/spacex-generated-ab...

(many reports of that same info around)

The article also contradicts itself later on:

> SpaceX’s rocket-launch and satellite-internet businesses are enormously profitable near-monopolies.

Was this article just AI generated spam? :(

adjejmxbdjdn34 minutes ago
The article states right up front that they’re not profitable because of xAI’s costs.

So there’s nothing contradictory about it.

In the second paragraph:

> SpaceX’s annual revenue last year was less than $20 billion, and it lost nearly $5 billion, according to a new report from The Information, mostly because of xAI’s huge capital costs.

barbacoa42 minutes ago
They are likely including xAI and the massive training costs that entails in order to make it sound like all their ventures are losing money.
BobAliceInATreeabout 2 hours ago
There's a reason why he's trying to reserve 30% of the IPO for retail investors.
hampowderabout 1 hour ago
please elaborate
killingtime74about 1 hour ago
Bagholders
deeviantabout 1 hour ago
There are ~7 born per minute. 95% of them are retail investors.

If you want actual reason, it's because he uses it as a money battery, i.e. funding xAI and SPACE DATA CENTERS.