Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 158 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#swift#clever#epitaph#eternally#physical#contrast#must#marsh#terribly#placed

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

velcrovanabout 2 hours ago
I may be dense but I’ve reread the article several times trying to understand exactly how this jab was supposed to work against its target. Was it the mere physical juxtaposition and contrast of tone and appearance? I feel like some clever wordplay must have been involved (such as the lines of Swift’s epitaph running into Marsh’s and changing their meaning) … otherwise it doesn’t seem terribly clever? But Swift was terribly clever in general, so I must be missing something.
russellbeattie3 minutes ago
[delayed]
thisisauseridabout 2 hours ago
Swift intentionally placed his stark and brief epitaph directly beside the gaudy and verbose monument of Marsh. This physical and rhetorical contrast eternally exposed the pompous vanity of his rival.
velcrovanabout 1 hour ago
Eternally until they moved one of them
nealabqabout 2 hours ago
Were this fiction, I would expect a denouement where images of the two memorial stones, black and white, when placed side by side (as Swift intended), reveal a subtle joke.
nealabqabout 3 hours ago
I find myself wondering if this essay is meant as a gentle satire. Bemused not savage, not Swiftian.

I am reminded of Lord Peter Wimsey.

thisisauseridabout 3 hours ago
Swift wrote his famous epitaph to eternally mock his bitter rival.

Thanks, Gemini.

smitty1eabout 2 hours ago
> Ozymandian pathos

...for the win.