Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

0% Positive

Analyzed from 135 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#flathub#apps#app#buggy#chromium#code#should#policy#https#org

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Arrowmaster1 day ago
This has been their policy but now it's more explicitly defined. Go look through the submissions on https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pulls?q=is%3Apr to understand how bad the problem they are dealing with is.
nextaccounticabout 1 hour ago
It's weird because I am sure that a large number of established apps in flathub, such as.. Chromium https://flathub.org/en/apps/org.chromium.Chromium has AI-assisted code, and this bans all AI-assisted code

The policy as it stands is contradictory with flathub practice, unless it specifies that already accepted apps are grandfathered or something like that.

weezingabout 22 hours ago
Any app store should
reverius42about 11 hours ago
Disagree, why should an app that works (and has AI contributed code) be banned, but not necessarily a buggy app written by a human? It's worse than a double standard.
no-name-hereabout 11 hours ago
Are “buggy” apps written by humans allowed? I guess it depends how buggy you're referring to, as most software (AI or not) likely has bugs.
weezingabout 5 hours ago
What kind of whataboutism is this? Both should be. AI generated slop has no place in app stores same as "buggy" apps whatever it means.