RU version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
80% Positive
Analyzed from 391 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#web#need#css#cost#more#dev#title#pay#development#possible

Discussion (9 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
We don't consciously think about every heartbeat or work out how all the light in the spectrum creates vision. Some things are best left solved. Paying hundreds of thousands people in an economy to be CSS masters is just wasteful. It's solved. Move on.
Tech experts have been quick to automate away other people's professions. The boot's now on the other foot.
Maybe you can't "master" every branch of web dev, but it's entirely possible to be competent at building out the whole stack if you focus on learning just one stack
Re: your pro-specialist argument -
"Specialists cost more because you either need to pay more to hire them, or you need to pay for the time it takes for somebody to become a specialist. But the productivity improvements should more than outweigh the cost."
Here lies the problem. I'm not sure the productivity improvements do outweigh the cost according to the metrics businesses track and care about. the benefit to customer experience or the structural integrity of the software outweighs the cost, but that's not something business leaders are incentivized to care about in a meaningful way.
the market for artisan software is just too small