RU version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
33% Positive
Analyzed from 229 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#author#website#manifesto#claude#mobile#ironic#making#dev#still#include

Discussion (9 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
I suspect the author of the website forgot to include in their prompt why they actually dislike AI Co-Author attributions. Or maybe they just have really bad colleagues
And that's while there are plenty of good reasons not to list the AI as co-author. I stopped letting Claude include it
I'm sure it's a context thing — but boy is it annoying.
This sounds like Claude from a mile away
“It strikes the tool. It keeps the person. Matching runs on both the display name and the email, normalized — so a renamed bot or a numeric noreply address doesn’t slip through. A human is never in the blast radius.”
The manifesto is me. The website is not — and I'd like to argue that's very non-ironic!
Here's the making of, linked at the bottom. https://no-ai-coauthors.dev/making-of.html
This manifesto website includes a git commit-msg hook for your favorite hook manager, and a GitHub Action for preventing contributions containing them from landing in your project.
Here's a link from the bottom of the page. https://no-ai-coauthors.dev/making-of.html