RU version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
100% Positive
Analyzed from 381 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#https#don#office#smalldocs#org#github#com#agents#code#examples

Discussion (13 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
Oh, and you're not the first, I started this a year ago. :)
I say it’s as if “Claude Code & Microsoft Office had a baby...”
Code available: https://github.com/espressoplease/smalldocs
Discord: https://discord.gg/txjATTsDaq
Sample document: https://smalldocs.org/blogs/what-is-a-smalldoc
Invoked via Claude Code by saying stuff like: “sdoc me the plan for this feature”, or “dig into our logs and sdoc me a report on our latency”
If you’re talking about the README, you are right, but I think the homepage has a lot of examples you can click: https://smalldocs.org/#learn
What does a human write to (for example) create the diagram mentioned in "A diagram, drawn from a description rather than dragged into place."?
To me this looks like AI-writes-everything and human-reads-everything.
It’s also nice to get out of the command line for doing deep reading.
I have had a few developers try it, and some small number of them use it week after week (as do I): https://smalldocs.org/analytics
1. Calling Microsoft Office simply "Office" without qualification treats it like a trademark, rather than a generic term that was in use for this class of product before MS appropriated it.
2. If you're going to treat it like a trademark, don't violate it in the same sentence.