Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 314 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#chromium#brave#helium#same#sense#ublock#scheme#https#github#com

Discussion (14 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

feverzsjabout 1 hour ago
They messed up basic color scheme, making it almost unusable.

[0]: https://github.com/imputnet/helium/issues/1532

[1]: https://github.com/imputnet/helium/issues/1850

duskdozerabout 1 hour ago
This is mostly an argument for full user customization. I'm willing to bet some people prefer the current scheme. Presumably the developer(s).
willtemperleyabout 1 hour ago
In the same sense that a blockchain can be forked by using software that only accepts certain types of block, is it possible to fork the WWW in a similar manner? e.g. with changes that neuter the ad-mongers.

For example coming up with a way to get rid of these god awful cookies. Maybe ad-monger sites could be allowed in the same way an insecure connection is allowed behind a series of warnings?

vitally3643about 1 hour ago
The internet is literally just a pipe. There's no limitation binding us to HTTP. You can use any protocol you want over the internet, anything at all.
bastawhiz18 minutes ago
Not sure I'd call it just a pipe, but maybe a series of tubes.
willtemperley43 minutes ago
Well quite. So why are we living in this surveillance hellscape?
pogueabout 2 hours ago
How are they going to be adding uBlock Origin to Chromium going forward if manifest v2 gets completely deprecated/removed entirely?
gruezabout 2 hours ago
AFAIK some of the other chromium forks (brave and/or edge?) were committed to backporting manifest v2 (or more specifically the webRequestBlocking API) for future chromium versions.
bjordabout 1 hour ago
this is not correct. neither brave nor edge has committed to that.

as of yet, there's no (publicly stated) contingency plan if the upstream mv2 code is excised, but I could be mistaken.

feverzsjabout 1 hour ago
Nothing. It will be a huge burden for them to maintain all the removed code. Their only choice is to integrate brave's adblocker.
pogueabout 1 hour ago
This seems to be the only way forward from what I can figure. Helium's main selling point is that it's essentially degoogled chromium + a few miscellaneous patches & full uBlock. But once Google completely strips all that out of Chromium project, that won't be a tenable option.

I'm not sure what Opera/Vivaldi/et al. use for their native adblocking, but Brave's rust adblocker makes the most sense to me. Really it's uBlock's filtering lists that keep the whole thing working anyway.

mrbluecoatabout 2 hours ago
> cause havoc, and put people first

An odd pairing

tancop18 minutes ago
if you follow wukko on twitter you know it makes sense. its the same guy who made cobalt the video downloader.
willtemperleyabout 1 hour ago
Not really. Every activist that made a real difference for the good caused some kind of havoc.