Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

33% Positive

Analyzed from 207 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#diagrams#signup#generated#didn#auto#sequence#bold#doesn#something#created

Discussion (9 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

meindnoch31 minutes ago
Auto-generated sequence diagrams are almost always useless. This one is no different.
bt1a22 minutes ago
"Auto-generated"? As in... a defined translation from one abstraction layer to another? Disagree
felooboolooomba22 minutes ago
Arrows need to be thicker. "Bold" doesn't work. Nitpick: "bold" doesn't really make sense in opacity settings.
mike_hock9 minutes ago
Hey guys, look at what I didn't make. I paid money to have someone/something else do it.
itsfarseen-1about 1 hour ago
How was this created?
billyp-rva35 minutes ago
Hi, author here. The app itself (Ilograph[0]) is fairly old; its first ShowHN was in 2019.

These particular yt-dlp diagrams were an experiment in getting meaningful sequence diagrams from a code repo using Claude. If you open the black tab on the left, you can see the source of the diagrams. Claude was able to generate most of this, albeit with a good amount of back-and-forth to get the details right, plus some manual tweaking in the end.

[0] https://www.ilograph.com

embedding-shape27 minutes ago
Kind of despised the way you didn't even let me see a preview of my own created graph without having to signup, and the signup prompt didn't show up until I fixed the mistakes in the YAML. So I pasted something (generated), spent some minutes fixing the mistakes, then get hit with a signup prompt, before being able to see the graph... Just be upfront with the signup requirement, don't let me edit anything, if you're gonna gate it like that.
billyp-rva8 minutes ago
Thanks for the heads up; that shouldn't have been happening. Please try again.
albert_e36 minutes ago
is there a "format" of describing an architetcure/design in such a way that it lens itself to such visualization?