RU version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
100% Positive
Analyzed from 292 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#multicast#networks#streaming#point#home#amp#more#things#understand#jellyfin

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
AT&T does (or did) use multicast for cable tv replacement...
To demonstrate...multicast TV distribution on a home network?
> For small home networks, there is no bandwidth difference between this and streaming solutions like Jellyfin.
Jellyfin and multicast TV distribution are not the same things, though. They're very different.
Some other things that are very different include: The temperature of Lake Superior, my mother's collection of weird ceramic houses that light up, and red herring.
> Yes, this was a cool technology,
Multicast has ceased to be a cool technology? That's hot.
> and if some large provider like AT&T wanted to use this to broadcast channels to everyone at once
They do that.
> it would've made more sense than streaming
They do that, as well.
> but even for that use case the world has moved on.
All of it? Uniformly?
> Does anyone watch scheduled television anymore except local news and sportsball?
We should not use multicast TV distribution on home networks for local news and sportsball?