Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

75% Positive

Analyzed from 381 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#smell#mycelium#color#wearer#don#something#gross#brewer#yeast#genetically

Discussion (24 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

AlanYxabout 1 hour ago
The claim in the article that saccharomyces cerevisiae (brewer's yeast) naturally produced the deep blue color in the butterfly example is not actually true, although it's a gorgeous effect.

These are genetically engineered variants of brewer's yeast designed to produce pigments.

Forgeties79about 1 hour ago
Wow you weren’t kidding that’s a beautiful color
inigyou15 minutes ago
You can buy this color for 3€/meter at any weekend fabric market.
dustfingerabout 1 hour ago
I wonder if there is a health hazard wearing this due to breathing in spores or toxins released into the air? Or perhaps there is a risk that the wearer will absorb harmful chemicals secreted by the mycelium via contact with the wearer's skin? Very interesting none the less. I have imagined humans making living clothes for a long time, so it is nice to see that idea materialize.
svachalekabout 1 hour ago
It seems telling that none of the photos show anyone wearing it.
funkygibbon38 minutes ago
I would buy one, but I don’t think I have mushroom in my wardrobe for it.
sajithdilshan15 minutes ago
This would turn into a mould infested nightmare
juancnabout 1 hour ago
How does it smell though?
ComputerPersonabout 1 hour ago
Most people associate mushrooms and fungi with the smell of their substrate; they commonly don't have a strong smell themselves

I doubt it has a smell stronger than the wearer

edit: this is a bad take, upon further research

_whiteCaps_about 1 hour ago
Chanterelles smell great. I would wear something that smelled like that.

Pine mushrooms, not so much.

fluoridation34 minutes ago
I've done cultures on agar agar and mycelium definitely does have a distinctive smell. To me it's reminiscent to the damp smell of a concrete basement, though less stale and unpleasant.
LoganDark20 minutes ago
Is there a possibility of the organisms escaping the material and infesting the environment? That's what I would worry about with mycelium.
andaiabout 1 hour ago
Could they make a house out of this?
bastawhiz4 minutes ago
It doesn't seem to have the rigidity to be structurally sound for construction.
josefritzishereabout 1 hour ago
Is there an adjective for something that's nifty but also gross?
sdellisabout 1 hour ago
Blursed!
kibwenabout 1 hour ago
I'm not sure it's any more objectively gross than normal textile materials. Imagine you lived in a hairless, furless world where nothing like wool was a thing, and then suddenly we discovered a weird fluffy mammal that extruded long fibers out of its flesh; the people of that world might call that gross, we'd just call it ordinary.
chrisjjabout 1 hour ago
> nutrient solution is applied over a hole, along with a small patch of fresh fungus

So, not repair itself.

dustfingerabout 1 hour ago
To be fair it only claimed "near self-repairing".
cestithabout 1 hour ago
One could think of it as mostly self-repairing with some outside encouragement.
soiltypeabout 1 hour ago
The headline is more ambitious, that's probably what they meant
chrisjjabout 1 hour ago
Nope. "Dress made of living mycelium can renew and repair itself".
andaiabout 1 hour ago
Does the fresh fungus need to be genetically identical? I read something about mycelial nuclei in high school and it was weird.
fluoridation30 minutes ago
I guess they're just trying to get the networks to interlace, not to reconstitute into a single organism and be capable of nutrient exchange, so I don't think it matters if they're identical or not.