Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

75% Positive

Analyzed from 448 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#read#code#text#thing#ast#should#stack#machine#obvious#blog

Discussion (15 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

sphabout 2 hours ago
Ctrl-Shift-C, click on a paragraph, search for "text-shadow" on the right pane of the inspector, untick the checkbox.

There is a time and place for text and retro-CRT effects, this isn't one.

narinciyeabout 2 hours ago
Thank you. I was about to get eye cancer
sscaryterryabout 1 hour ago
Exactly, I stopped trying to read it, thought I didn't have my glasses on.
noelwelshabout 1 hour ago
Made my day that it references an article I wrote! :-D

Another thing that is kinda neat: there is a duality (a bidirectional transform) between the AST for a tree walking interpreter and the AST for a stack machine. To create the stack machine AST, all you do is remove any occurrence of the expression type in the tree-walking AST; these values are now found on the stack. Obvious when you think about it, but useful nonetheless. I don't think there is a simple equivalent for a register machine as, unless you have an infinite number of registers, you need to do register allocation.

(If the author reads this, my name changed from Noel to Neal at some point. I don't really mind though; my name is a bit unusual and I've been called all sorts of things.)

whilenot-dev22 minutes ago
Just read your blog post[0], thanks for it!

If I may leave some feedback here...

It'd be cool if you could add some syntax highlighting, because being at it is, it's hard to distinguish comments from code paths. The code snippets are just Scala anyway, aren't they?

Why, in the switch dispatch- and the subroutine threading-variants, is the recursive call in the dispatch function done with a call to loop(...)? Is that some Scala specific thing for recursion?

[0]: https://noelwelsh.com/posts/understanding-vm-dispatch/

froh42about 3 hours ago
Why the fuck make a tech web page unreadable with CRT effects? Thank god, there is reader mode in Firefox.
klibertp41 minutes ago
It's not that bad... But it is bad. It looks cool, and I managed to read the first few paragraphs. But when the code scrolled into view, it stopped looking cool and became an eye-destroying disaster.

YMMV, but OP, if you read this, please consider disabling the text-shadow for code snippets... or disabling syntax highlighting in code snippets. These two things are not a good thing together.

ubercoreabout 3 hours ago
Everyone says they want the weird more personal internet back, then this is what we get when someone does a weird internet thing!
mister_mortabout 2 hours ago
I think they could get a close-enough effect by removing the horizontal lines on the text glyphs themselves. This would still keep the colorscheme and slight glow, but drastically improve readability.
QuadmasterXLIIabout 1 hour ago
“everyone has reader mode” is I guess freeing?
layer8about 1 hour ago
Might as well give up on CSS and just use brutalist HTML in that case.
bigfishrunning12 minutes ago
We should do that anyway, CSS was a mistake. I miss gopher.
arethuzaabout 2 hours ago
I actually find it quite readable - YMMV.
sphabout 2 hours ago
Then, with all due respect, you should not be anywhere near the design or evaluation of accessible systems.

There's people reading this blog with all types of devices, screens, lighting and range of visual acuity. Even if you're blessed with perfect vision and excellent displays, it should be obvious that readability has been lowered for no obvious reason.

The point of a blog is for people to read it, so it fails at its foremost job.

arethuzaabout 2 hours ago
I wasn't saying that I thought it should be adopted as a standard for others to follow - just that (somewhat weirdly) I personally find the code segments on that page quite easy to read.