What Happens If OpenAI Dies?

tthelastgallon about 2 hours ago 37 commentsRead Article on wheresyoured.at

RU version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

80% Positive

Analyzed from 1159 words in the discussion.

Discussion (37 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

bogzz•about 2 hours ago

Zitron is far more negative when it comes to the utility of LLMs than I am, but dear God would it be satisfying to watch him be proven right on the financials.

His as-of-late frequent appearances on Bloomberg, CNBC, and Scott Galloway's podcast, as well as his collaborations with Ed Elson from Galloway's podcast must feel like a great vindication for him already. Quite impressive for a person who is self-taught in that area, just over the past two years.

edit: And, of course, the post is flagged. We must bury our heads in the sand again.

dgellow•5 minutes ago

Doesn't look flagged to me. Though it triggered the flamewar checks I think

paxys•about 1 hour ago

It’s far from vindication. All these TV networks have slots dedicated for extreme doomers to come in and say “the sky is falling! There’s going to be a recession soon. Sell everything!!” Been seeing it every day for 15 years now.

dgellow•3 minutes ago

They generally don't show their hand, Zitron has shared his complete thesis openly

bogzz•about 1 hour ago

Time will tell.

waffletower•about 1 hour ago

I had to use Google to find the comments after I read the story. Y-combinator moderation is far from invisible.

VCFundedGenYer•about 1 hour ago

Zitron is really really good. He taught me the strategy of "screenshot all the wild AI-bro claims" to keep track of them and call them out when it all collapses. The comments here villifying him are wrong and unhinged. Sometimes you need to be disliked a little to correctly predict the future.

WarmWash•about 1 hour ago

>"screenshot all the wild AI-bro claims" to keep track of them and call them out when it all collapses.

But have you done the same for Zitron? Because the AI-Bros have consistently been more accurate and Zitron consistently pretty wrong.

Zitron proclaimed in (early) 2024 that LLMs were stuck because there was no more data to use, and synthetic data ruined models, so we were already at the brink of collapse.

PLenz•about 2 hours ago

Probably a cambrian explosion of new startups. New stars are made of the refuse of old ones.

WarmWash•about 2 hours ago

What happens if people realize Ed Zitron has been rage farming to harvest subscription dollars for a few years now?

advisedwang•21 minutes ago

Thats basically all journalism

packetlost•about 2 hours ago

He sells outrage to ill informed people who don't know any better. There's real issues, but it's far more nuanced than Zitron seems willing to bring to his audience.

tyleo•about 2 hours ago

I welcome AI skepticism but Ed’s often does seem to be done in bad faith. I feel like his claims border on, “AI has no use case whatsoever.” Which clearly isn’t true in 2026.

reticulates•about 1 hour ago

I don’t think that’s Ed’s position. As I understand it, Ed’s position is that it has no real economic value.

AI is a tool, a useful tool, an innovative tool, but technology has introduced innovative tool after innovative tool for years. Apache, Twitter’s Bootstrap, Pull to Refresh, React, Kubernetes, all innovative, all delivered real business value. Nobody invested hundreds of billions of capital into infrastructure for React.

AI has endless use cases. Theres no evidence that these use cases deliver the value necessary to justify any capital expenditure. A technology can change the world and have no standalone business case.

Business is boring. Money in, money out. We are still waiting for Anthropic and OpenAI to show how LLMs have moved the needle on business.

Every single thing that an LLM can be used to deliver value for a business today can be achieved by a cheap to run open weight model that companies could host in house. Where does that leave the trillion+ worth of dollars being buried in the ground?

0gs•about 1 hour ago

look, he says right at the beginning he is NOT trying to be a buzzkill!!! this is real news!!! haha

sebastianconcpt•about 2 hours ago

Edit the config of the AI startups you have properly designed to be platform agnostic and make it use the other platforms models, wait the CI green and deploy prod

throwaw12•about 2 hours ago

Stock market might dip 20%+, because OpenAI is a large buyer of GPUs, RAMs, servers and disks, every chip company will be impacted from removing huge customer from their revenue.

then flywheel effect might kick off and impact carriers and construction companies building data centers and delivering things there.

which impacts investor trust and they might start pulling their money from AI companies, which in turn, they either need to increase prices or downsize their efforts

mikewarot•about 2 hours ago

I find it hard to justify any conclusion other than we're about to repeat the crash of 1929 in terms of stock prices. Back then, stocks dropped 90% over 3 years. We'll be lucky if 10% actual value remains after the bonfire that's about to happen.

soupfordummies•7 minutes ago

So, what, should I withdraw my 401k and buy physical gold?

ivan_gammel•about 2 hours ago

Chip makers may be fully booked now and have extra revenue because of AI, but that also creates deferred demand elsewhere. The prices will not fall immediately because of the crash of a single company. The scarcity has probably negative impact on the economy in general, so stock market should recover after that quickly or at least stay near a healthy valuation level.

throwaw12•about 1 hour ago

when market sees huge storm of un-bought devices, prices will drop, companies waiting on the line will also drop their contracts because they don't want to buy chips with pre-crash prices and renegotiate their prices

Barbing•41 minutes ago

Unfairly flagged, bumped way off front page: https://news.social-protocols.org/stats?id=49347207

It’s a long read with well-sourced numbers that make the point well.

paxys•about 2 hours ago

Not commenting on the rest of the piece but why is everyone assuming that OpenAI’s executive departures are all voluntary? Sam Altman has shown plenty of willingness to clean house among the top ranks in the past. He isn’t going to shy away from firing a revenue officer if targets aren’t being met.

PKop•about 1 hour ago

I don't think they need to be voluntary to be pessimistic about the implication of the departures. It can be argued just as easily that so may high level execs being fired because of underperformance means OpenAI isn't achieving their goals. Revenue targets not being met is a large part of AI bubble promoters' thesis.

paxys•about 1 hour ago

The article asserts that executives are leaving because they know OpenAI will fail and so their shares will be worthless soon. That’s a much more extreme read of the situation than the company simply being behind on some internal goals.

edgyquant•about 2 hours ago

I doubt they would go public if anthropic does and it’s a slaughter. Allowing anthropic to go first might be in their best interest.

downrightmike•about 1 hour ago

We all get 1TB ram in our PC as the default

midas89•about 2 hours ago

your data get's sold

kraig911•about 2 hours ago

This. I also think there'll be more local AI models to fill gaps and people see how we've become needlessly dependent and we start using AI responsibly.

josefritzishere•about 1 hour ago

This seems to be an increasingly likely outcome. But In the aftermath, like the dot com crash, the debt, and assets are distributed in the liquidation. So it's not the death of AI, or even of ChatGPT. Doctorow wrote about this, but with less bombast than Zitron. https://doctorow.medium.com/https-pluralistic-net-2025-09-27...

waffletower•about 1 hour ago

A less bombastic quote from the cited Doctorow: " AI is the asbestos we are shoveling into the walls of our society and our descendants will be digging it out for generations". I am a big fan of Cory, but as a developer I tend to think that AI will continue to aid us in refining what we shovel as well as what was once already shoveled -- refining it from a carcinogen into a benign and load-bearing :D foundation. The metaphor is catchy, but may not be apt, unless somehow we unilaterally decide that use of AI itself is the cancer and we all act to eliminate it. I think a dismal fate for OpenAI and Anthropic is likely quite separate from the fate of AI itself, particularly for software development.

nater5000•about 2 hours ago

Just another article re-iterating the same bearish takes on these companies with sprinklings of quirky uses of profanity to let you know the author is a human. If you're not interested in reading the same thing you've been reading for the last few years, feel free to move on.

hmokiguess•about 2 hours ago

Could we end up with a merger between them and Anthropic?

steezeburger•about 2 hours ago

https://www.wheresyoured.at/what-happens-if-openai-dies/#ant...

> I think it’s very unlikely this happens, and if it does, it would be ruinous for everybody involved.

The full snippet is in TFA.

hmokiguess•about 1 hour ago

hahahaah thank you, I asked too soon, realized later it was covered in there lol

1attice•about 1 hour ago

Another excellent Zitron article.

The actual numbers he presents are well sourced and, sadly, correct.

Even if AI is the future of computing, we will have a 9.x economic earthquake headed our way.

Read his articles carefully. Don't be distracted by the salt, the swearing is just there to help the numbers go down easier.

Work it out with a pencil. For those of us with the usual innumeracy about billions, trillions, etc, it can be helpful to draw diagrams on graph paper.

Also, @dang, unflag this please, it is well within the HN ambit.