TechPulseTechPulse
Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

0% Positive

Analyzed from 225 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#commit#feature#github#why#workflow#gerrit#stacked#working#fix#sounds

Discussion (10 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

NamlchakKhandro•about 1 hour ago
Who is creating a separate PR for each commit on their feature/fix branch?

sounds like crazy town.

I just dont understand why someone would operate like this.

Lets assume you're squash merging your feature branchs to your local main, then you're raising the them as prs.

why would you do this?

verall•15 minutes ago
On large teams I think the "cherry pick" workflow (Gerrit style) beats the "pull request" workflow (GitHub/gitlab style). On smaller teams it's the other way around. I think it's somewhere around 10-20 people actively committing that the cherry pick workflow comes out ahead.
steveklabnik•about 1 hour ago
This is standard practice in the "stacked diffs" world: one review, one commit.
what•43 minutes ago
Why would you have more than one commit for a PR? That sounds like crazy town.
jsphweid•44 minutes ago
1 commit == 1 reviewable unit == 1 PR == 1 CL == 1 feature == 1 fix is a perfectly reasonable way of working.

I used to work at companies where no one squashed their commits and the entire git logs were filled with 80% non-sense like "temp" or "bad" or "working" with the other 20% being coherent changes. What's the point of doing this I ask?

cobalt•14 minutes ago
it lets you maintain version history when working, then most workflows auto squash on merge
jasonlotito•about 1 hour ago
As someone who much prefers Gerrit's UI/UX over GitHub's UI, I was disappointed that this wasn't replicating the UI for GH reviews.
esafak•about 2 hours ago
Does it use Github's new stacked PR feature?

Edit: apparently stacked PRs on GH are older than I thought; the readme references a 2024 blog post about it.

dietr1ch•about 2 hours ago
It seems so, https://github.com/runetes/maiao#quick-example

As they say in mtg, reading the card explains the card

martythemaniak•about 2 hours ago
Gerrit. Now that's a name I've not heard in a long time. A long time