RU version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
75% Positive
Analyzed from 435 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#chatgpt#users#content#minors#illegal#online#platforms#against#technology#better

Discussion (12 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
Who is against this exactly?
My guess is that ChatGPT will do their best to comply but whatever they do, the EU will find that they did not do a perfect job and issue a €x billion fine.
The core aims of the law are unambiguous in both aim and implementation, and serve to enforce existing consumer rights. Please feel free to highlight which of these you feel represents an onerous or undue burden on the corporations in the name of enforcing some very basic ethical guardrails for the vulnerable in society.
- Swift removal of illegal content online, including products, services: a clearer “notice and action” procedure where users will be empowered to report illegal content online and online platforms will have to act quickly.
- Victims of cyber violence will be better protected especially against non-consensual sharing of illegal content (revenge porn) with immediate takedowns.
- Transparency obligations for platforms allow users to be better informed about how content is recommended to them (recommender systems) and to choose at least one option not based on profiling.
- Online advertising: users will have better control over how their personal data are used. Targeted advertising is banned when it comes to sensitive data (e.g. based on sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity).
- Protection of minors: platforms accessible to minors will have to take specific measures to protect them, including by fully banning targeted advertising.
- Manipulating users’ choices through ‘dark patterns’ will be prohibited. Moreover, cancelling a subscription for a service should become as easy as subscribing to it.
- Compensation: recipients of digital services will have a right to seek redress for any damages or loss suffered due to infringements by platforms.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220412IP...
I’m against it because the EU should be at the forefront of science and technology.
I need a [industry where the EU is lagging], [justification for raising a tax], [food with a PDO label], and a [refugee group who gets special treatment].