Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

0% Positive

Analyzed from 168 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#article#age#years#person#money#different#paycheck#maclean#canadians#aged

Discussion (3 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Rooster6115 minutes ago
I've never understood the logic behind the idea of a "nest egg". Years ago, perhaps, it might not have been clear to the average person that money has to grow over time to stave off inflation, but that information has been widely available for decades and many people still don't put money into any kind of investment.

Not judging anyone. Circumstances are different for each and every person, and financial literacy isn't universal. But I am genuinely curious as to how such a large number of people that have/had careers that paid ok end up paycheck to paycheck when retirement comes around.

220hertzabout 1 hour ago
Man, I though MacLean's was dead. I haven't see one of those in 25 years. But from the article:

Forty per cent of us in this age range have less than $5,000 in savings.

That's Canadians, aged 55-64. I expect younger generations will be no different. It's an awful lot of people, given the age demographic in the country.

georgemcbay27 minutes ago
> That's Canadians, aged 55-64.

And while this is a Maclean's article, so it is understandably focused on Canada, pretty much everything covered in the article is also relevant to Americans with similar numbers... but with the added shitshow that prior to age 65 you will have severe health insurance concerns if you are underemployed.