How concerned should we be about Astra's recurrent architecture?

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

dang•2 minutes ago

Related ongoing thread:

OpenAI's new reasoning technique alarms AI safety experts - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49552395

samrus•12 minutes ago

I like the idea of more reccurance in the transformer level. Chain of thought always seemed so clunky. Its just not the way the human brain processes information. Its an extrmeely crude approximation at best

sznio•3 minutes ago

it is what I do to solve hard problems through.

easy stuff happens by itself, but with a system large enough you need a scratchpad and a rubber duck.

d_silin•10 minutes ago

A debate between grossly incompetent against grossly immoral, honestly.

You should ignore anything LessWrong or OpenAI says and do your own research.

d_silin•6 minutes ago

To add a bit more constructive feedback, think of the "AI cornucopia" and "Superintelligence destroys humanity" as opposite ends of all possible outcomes distribution (low probability event).

The most likely one is the "business as usual, but with AI" - some things will get better, some things will get worse, but overall state of affairs will remain mostly the same.

How concerned should we be about Astra's recurrent architecture?

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews