Ask HN: (Why) Was the LLM breakthrough useful for images, audio, etc.?

rrogerrogerr about 13 hours ago 2 comments

RU version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

This has been bothering me for a while. I feel like I have a decent conceptual grasp of what LLMs are doing with written text. But it seems like they also unlocked a bunch of progress in understanding and generating images, audio, and video. I can’t twist my brain into understanding the connection.

Is the boom in generated non-text content also built on LLMs, or is it just correlated with it because a bunch of excitement drove investment into the industry? I’m hoping for an ELI-non-ai-but-cs-major, this has been bothering me for a while.

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 66 words in the discussion.

Discussion (2 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

jerlendds•about 13 hours ago

VLM != LLM. Vision language models basically treat text tokens and image tokens the same. Post-training an LLM on images+text can improve its capabilities. Id recommend searching around the keyword VLM to find more resources on how multi-modal AI works.

- https://huggingface.co/blog/vlms

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multimodal_learning

verdverm•about 11 hours ago

transformers were first an image understanding technique, the text processing came later, it's all about the training data and gradient descent, and allegedly attention