Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

36% Positive

Analyzed from 1786 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#flight#sorry#airline#delay#flights#don#cancelled#nats#airlines#more

Discussion (74 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

Hard_Space1 minute ago
Just had to cancel my 10-year passport renewal appointment for tomorrow morning, since it's in London and I'm in the EU. Man, this was a *miserable* way to spend a day. The flight kept getting bumped, heading for certain cancellation (it came, about midnight, long after I had returned from the airport); GPT was incredibly helpful on how to redeem (most of) the shit-ton of money I had paid for a 4-hour passport renewal appointment, and what my rights and obligations were in this situation.

In particular it pointed me to authority docs declaring that if a flight is 5+ hours late, you can refuse to fly, reclaim the money and exit the airport. So when the next update said that the flight had been bumped 9 hours, I had all I needed to secure that and went home. Two hours later, the app announced the flight was cancelled.

Sometimes (really a lot) I want to kick GPT's/Claude's/Gemini's collective rear ends. And then there are times like these, when, with me in a funk, AI cuts straight through to the essential knowledge I need and lowers the temperature.

dtfabout 2 hours ago
NATS - the same system that crashed in August 2023 [1] due to an id clash, causing 2000 flights to be cancelled and days of chaos.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37461695

8by3about 2 hours ago
I briefly thought you meant the issue was NATS - https://docs.nats.io/learn/core-nats
Betelbuddyabout 1 hour ago
Its normally always DNS (Departures Now Stalled)
reactordevabout 1 hour ago
Not TCP (Takeoff Clearance Prohibited)
illwrksabout 2 hours ago
For anyone stranded, read up on UK261/EU261 and your airlines application process to be reimbursed. As far as I’m aware it’s not likely to happen automatically, you need to initiate the process (and record audio/video just in case proof is needed)
ktallettabout 2 hours ago
You won't get compensation for ATC issues, but you will be reimbursed.
d1sxeyes12 minutes ago
Yeah but I don't think it's that legislation you'd rely on: you paid for a service they didn't deliver.

Compensation yeah, only applies if the reason for the delay/cancellation was under the airline's control. Nats down is pretty clearly a reason to reject compensation claims.

junofanabout 1 hour ago
Eh, I tried in 2017 with BA when their system went down and received nothing. There was magically a Black Lives Matter protest at Gatwick (or maybe LCY, can’t remember) on the same day, which isn’t covered apparently.
petercooper19 minutes ago
I believe the compensation part only kicks in if it’s the airline’s fault.
illwrks15 minutes ago
You may be right. As a direct result of the NATS issue perhaps not, but any second order issues once that is resolve you might be within scope.
illwrks18 minutes ago
I think the qualifying rules may have changed since then.

The legislation is on the link below, it might be worth a once-over with your chat bot of choice to understand out if your circumstances are covered:

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2004/261/contents

surgical_fire32 minutes ago
This affected flights going to the UK as well.

Source: Me, stuck in an airport, having witnessed numerous flights destined to London canceled throughout the day.

PowPow61913 minutes ago
This brings up the ol' ATC government ran vs privatization debate
johnnyApplePRNGabout 1 hour ago
In the middle of a highly geopolitically sensitive moment where there's been bombs at other European airports recently?

Color me suspicious.

heyitsmedotjaybabout 1 hour ago
Immediately after UK announced sanctions on illegal settlements...
tacheiordacheabout 1 hour ago
Israel sabotagged Spain as well, I can’t believe how naive most people are in support of Israel
heyitsmedotjayb6 minutes ago
Its disgusting the way they weaponize migration and racism.
talhaanwar38 minutes ago
happen after every few years
varispeedabout 1 hour ago
IT sector in the UK is bargain basement. Most competent people left for countries where their talents are valued or retired.
ifwinterco35 minutes ago
It's fine for fintech etc, but air traffic control software yes I imagine not so much.

Likely either outsourced or done by people who are comically underpaid considering how important it is

Cthulhu_23 minutes ago
It's also huge amounts of code for very old standards
IshKebab20 minutes ago
You know there was someone who tried to refactor whatever code it was that broke here and was told it was too risky.
doublerabbitabout 2 hours ago
Including mine. I'm not angry because my flight was cancelled. It's a pain in the arse but what really infuriates me is the "We are terribly sorry" these PR releases give. I've been on hold for three hours with British Airlines and it's "we are sorry", no you're not.

"We are truly sorry for the ongoing flight disruption" is what infuriates the situation; when words have no meaning behind the phase. Pixelated hold-music I am sure is designed to make you rage further.

ryandrakeabout 1 hour ago
Whenever a company communicates how "sorry" they are, I can't help but think about South Park[1].

1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9u0EL_u4nvw

bcraven9 minutes ago
"Sorry for any inconvenience"

What do you mean, it's ALL inconvenient!

Davieyabout 2 hours ago
My wife is currently at Gatwick, supposed to have taken off 2 hours ago, but no update.... The frustrating thing is the complete lack of information. I cannot comprehend how nobody knows what the situation is. I mean, is aircraft on the tarmac yet? Has it left it's previous destination yet? etc.

Worst part is, likely no compensation as it isn't the airlines "fault".

dylan604about 2 hours ago
Why the use of scare quotes? It's not their fault. The airline arranged for flight crew, had the plane available, yet something outside of their control is preventing them from doing the deed. It's no different to the airline if a sudden bit of weather came along preventing the flight from taking off.
donalhuntabout 1 hour ago
I think the frustration comes from airlines not being able to accurately predict what the impact of a delay will be for the schedule for the remainder of the day, following day. They always hope they'll be able to recover some of the schedule with fast turnarounds.

On a recent trip (when I encountered issues on every leg — cancellations, delays, missed connections, you name it), it is clear that airlines are incentivised to not communicate delays until it is clear the delay can't be recovered. In one case, at the airline's hub, the airport displays were showing a 2 hour delay and their app showed on-time departure (to the point I had to go and ask which source to trust). Having been a frequent flyer in the past I was able to determine that the delay was likely (but airlines can swap in equipment at hubs and mitigate the delay).

Once you do have a delay the ripples are complex to handle. You have some passengers that were meant to connect to other flights. You have some that won't travel at all die to the cancellation. You then have 100+ people who you somehow have to accommodate in the coming days when flight loads are hopefully already 90+%.

To be fair to my airline, their app was actually great at offering me a rebooking option the following day when my flight was cancelled. Unfortunately, the option I selected resulted in a non-direct flight with a transfer time that was impossible in reality (shouldn't have been offered in my opinion). I was literally rebooked 5mins after they declared the flight cancelled, skipped the queues back in the departure area (I don't think the local service agents even knew about the app) and drove home to my family for an extra night.

Daviey35 minutes ago
Because nobody in this situation is accountable. I agree the airline may not be to blame for the cause, but SOMEONE is... but NATS do not carry the same responsibility.

It blows my mind that consumers have lots of protection from the airline, but we have no protection from ATC failures.

As it happens, flight just got cancelled.. so airline is responsible for hotel and rebook. Which is also unfair on them.

ljf41 minutes ago
In the UK we use quotation marks when we are quoting some verbatim.

Scare quotes are an Americanism that is gaining traction her, but normally we use it for quoting speach.

chairmansteveabout 1 hour ago
The problem is that the airlines don't let you know what is happening. They deliberately keep you in the dark.
SoftTalker43 minutes ago
What would you prefer they say?
idle_zealot38 minutes ago
Completely utilitarian message. "Your flight #FLIGHTID (src -> dst @ time) is cancelled on account of REASON. For available flights click LINK. For reimbursement click LINK."
basisword28 minutes ago
What do you want them to say? It's an ATC issue. The airline don't know when it'll be fixed and can't do much until it is.
exogenousdata17 minutes ago
“We’re sorry, but our business model precludes timely responses in times of system stress.

As a reminder, our shareholders are our primary concern (by law) and staffing trained humans to handle in customer support during unexpected surges isn’t something that can be supported while also funding the €0.05 per share quarterly dividend paid to British Airways share holders on June 29th of this year.

We are not in a rush. If you’d like, try another airline. But they’re all the same.

Beep.”

colechristensenabout 1 hour ago
People will be angry regardless of what they say, some if they say they're sorry, some if they don't say they're sorry. Regardless of what they say, some set of people or another is going to come out and be angry about it.

What do you hope to accomplish with the phone call?

Failures happen, does it make a difference if there's someone in charge feeling a strong emotion about it? Do the call center staff have to feel genuine guilt as if their mediocre job somehow made them personally responsible?

Being angry is just as useless as faking being sorry, all they're doing is acknowledging a screwup in an automated message. Give them a break.

alistairSHabout 1 hour ago
In the past year, I've flown for vacation twice, with delays on one leg of each.

First one, United flight from IAD to SJU, 4-5 hour delay, mechanical issue, with updates from the gate agent every 45 minutes or so, basically keeping us well apprised of the status of our plane (and when that plane was no longer viable, of the replacement plane and then replacement crew). "Flight crew saw a warning light and needs to talk to company" then "company says try again" then "that didn't work, maintenance crew coming to look at it" then a few more similar updates. No, there was nothing we could do with the info, but it was nice to know the problem was being worked - at least made me feel less out of control.

Second one, Aer Lingus from DUB to IAD, 4 hour delay, mechanical issue, no updates from the gate agent beyond "so sorry, we're delayed another hour" every hour or so. I found this much more frustrating. No, there was nothing I could do either way, but it would have been nice to know a bit more about what was wrong, who was working the problem, etc. This felt more out of control, and more frustrating.

dboreham42 minutes ago
You really only know for sure when the captain walks up the jet way and tells the assembled passengers him/her self.
lbrinerabout 1 hour ago
I suspect there is a name for thinking that, "if I do something, it will get resolved quicker". Lots of us won't just sit there and wait for someone to come and tell us when it is fixed because we don't trust that other people also want to resolve the problem.
blitzar40 minutes ago
Sounds like pedestrian push-buttons on crossings - satisfies people but it doesnt actually do anything.
mcmcmcabout 1 hour ago
Why wouldn’t they be sorry? It’s bad for them too
gsprabout 1 hour ago
Because only people who aren't actually sorry spend their time saying sorry instead of doing the one thing that would actually help people – provide detailed information on what the hell is going on.
ktallettabout 2 hours ago
Do you expect them to employ enough staff to answer passenger calls for this rare occasion? That is not good business.
dude250711about 1 hour ago
Better for the planet though.
Havoc36 minutes ago
Don't think so. The people will still need to fly and incidents like these mean lots of planes are out of place and may need to fly extra to reposition
tcfhgj25 minutes ago
most flights are not necessary
IshKebab20 minutes ago
Define "necessary". Good luck.
w4yai36 minutes ago
Who knows. Maybe someone will decide to compensate with 2 flights instead of one.
dlcarrierabout 1 hour ago
Ocean liners use several times more fuel per passenger mile than airliners.
deweyabout 1 hour ago
Thats a bit of an odd comparison as they are in pretty different categories and don’t really compete against each other.
reaperducer42 minutes ago
Ocean liners use several times more fuel per passenger mile than airliners.

So what? Two things can be bad at the same time. Nobody mentioned ocean liners except you. Why not bring up the greenhouse gases from landfills while you're at it?

Whatabouting everything is so last decade.

monocasa39 minutes ago
Calling everything "whatabouting" when someone is just responding and expanding context to an existing comparison is what's actually last decade.
TomatoCo38 minutes ago
What's the alternative?
tialaramex3 minutes ago
Really often the alternative was not to make the journey. Whether that's the in-person visit to a customer site which could have been a video call (or an email) or the trip to go see how your Porsche was made in the factory.

WG21 (the C++ Standards Committee) only began to allow you to present proposals or attend committee meetings without flying around the world in... 2020 because of Pandemic restrictions.

Video conferencing was one of the technologies in Engelbart's "Mother of all demos" in 1968. Remember that year, not 2008, not even 1998, it was demonstrated in 1968 and yet I bet several readers of this comment have flown on an aeroplane to do something they could have done using video conferencing, almost sixty years later. What a joke.

foxwell_1959about 1 hour ago
Got me confused with that title, thinking what “100 seconds of flights” would look like.
gilleainabout 1 hour ago
About a minute and a half.
contingenciesabout 1 hour ago
Sorry wouldn't fit ;)
Advertisement
small_model44 minutes ago
Wonder if any of this code was outsourced to India 'cut costs'
dv_dt10 minutes ago
Following neoliberal economic strategy has optimized for profit maxing over basic quality of life, let alone competency of building and operating complex systems. While the US is #1 in the trend, the UK is following pretty closely
maxrev179 minutes ago
UK is a cesspit now