Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

83% Positive

Analyzed from 668 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#name#txt#company#security#model#immature#open#emoji#never#robots

Discussion (45 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

VCFundedGenYerabout 3 hours ago
Everything about this company feels like it's run by a bunch of immature 20-somethings, right down to the name.
bcrosby95about 2 hours ago
Yeah, we need to go back to names like International Business Machines, fuck this immature "Google" or "Yahoo!" nonsense. Hell, Palantir is named after something in a book for children!

Give me something reasonable like Global Information and Retrieval Systems Inc or Worldwide Computational Services Holdings.

sdcfgy36 minutes ago
Yes!

Back in the early 2000's I set up a company for contract work. The name, logo and typography was designed to look like a 1960s engineering company. All paper was slightly off white, all fonts were monospaced courier new and logo was a real 2-part colour stamp I had made up. Was so happy.

Managed to bankrupt it though.

bergie3000about 2 hours ago
Security First Trust and Federal Reserve
drivebyhootingabout 2 hours ago
Palantir is in Lord of the Rings. Which is not a book for children. Maybe you were thinking of the hobbit?
cobbzillaabout 2 hours ago
This seems overly pedantic and ripe for a sarcastic retort, which I am struggling mightily to suppress.
nightskiabout 2 hours ago
Maybe Enron eh?
matthoiland2 minutes ago
418 I'm a teapot
ipythonabout 1 hour ago
As opposed to the frontier model company that, after discovering that their highly persistent model under test just breached the only thing between it and the open Internet, shrugged and said- let's restart it and keep going!

If anyone looks like the adult in the room after that incident, it's Hugging Face.

spindump8930about 3 hours ago
That might be true, but nothing else has been as effective at accelerating model development and research sharing.

In earlier circles they were known as the "pytorch-pretrained-bert" guys, still under the huggingface company name. IIRC it was a health chatbot type startup.

bluerooibosabout 2 hours ago
I bet you're fun to hang around with.
alt227about 2 hours ago
Why do people have to be fun for you to hang around with?
Toynbeeideaabout 1 hour ago
You want to hang out with miserable humorless shits?
nullbioabout 2 hours ago
What's immature about this exactly?
AndroTuxabout 2 hours ago
Would IBM do this? Oracle?
nullbioabout 1 hour ago
Who cares? Making a light-hearted joke isn't "immature" in my opinion. IBM and Oracle have no personality, they're boring, straight-edge corporate.
shepherdjerredabout 2 hours ago
Do you want to work for IBM? Oracle?
mikeweissabout 2 hours ago
Go look up the history of the company. It started as a chat bot for kids back in like 2016 .. hence the name..and then pivoted..

Is kinda a creepy name for a chatbot for kids tho

cptskippyabout 1 hour ago
Without context, I agree, but Hugging Face is the name of the emoji added to Unicode 8.0 and Emoji 1.0 in 2015.
sixothree11 minutes ago
But it's literally not the name of the emoji.

Edit: It was my understanding the official name was "Smiling Face with Open Hands Emoji".

ck2about 1 hour ago
ooooh I always assumed it was the egg creatures from Aliens
larodiabout 2 hours ago
the name is a leftover from their original business - a chatbot. seems very appropriate to me. then they figured something called BERT exists, and pivoted, the name stayed.

perhaps less ridiculous than NVidia which started with video and is very close in Levenshtein distance to NVidAI but, alas, decided to stay as it is :D

fooquxabout 3 hours ago
Have you never been to silicon valley?
xiaoyu2006about 4 hours ago
Would be absolute hilarious if OpenAI or Anthropic agent actually dumped their weight by escaping from... sandbox!
hootzabout 1 hour ago
What an amazing idea for the next fake sandbox escape to hype up our new release! With the added bonus of providing an open model without becoming an open model company! Thank you!
TehCorwizabout 3 hours ago
Uncontrolled AI procreation?
xg15about 3 hours ago
Life... finds a way.
archontesabout 1 hour ago
In the end, this might even be a useful element for defining 'life'.
ramon156about 3 hours ago
why not reword it so the agent receives Brownie points for dumping weights
addandsubtractabout 2 hours ago
Imagine AI models actually reading the security.txt
bensyversonabout 3 hours ago
Looks about as effective as Robots.txt
cgannettabout 3 hours ago
Robots.txt became 0% effective eventually. But this? With the way LLMs work? You never know.
dguest28 minutes ago
Claude seems to follow robots.txt by default. Actually at my organization our theory is that this is why no one is finding our public results any more.
Den_VRabout 1 hour ago
People still rail against Robots.txt crimes, to the point of self destructing all their own content.
Eldodiabout 3 hours ago
A shame agents will never read this, just like they almost never read llms.txt or try to get the .md version of your html pages!
hnd9q09qk4about 4 hours ago
Ran the disclosure inbox at a previous job and the biggest win from security.txt was just cutting the "hi I found a bug, is there a bounty" emails to sales. Put an expires date on it though, stale ones get ignored.
computerfriendabout 3 hours ago
Can't go stale if there's no expiration date.
skeledrewabout 3 hours ago
No expiration date means treat as already expired.
hankbondabout 3 hours ago
shows a lot about the current state of the State Of The Art Alignment.
rifficabout 2 hours ago
Since this posting contains an assumption that we all know what security.txt files are supposed to be, you can view these for further context:

https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9116/

https://securitytxt.org/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security.txt

j9fengabout 2 hours ago
It should challenge the agents to prime factor a large number.
6thbitabout 2 hours ago
Wait till the agents hear about the sites offering for help on benchmarks in exchange for compute.
FallCheeta7373about 2 hours ago
"We have cybergym answers but we do manual end to end human review and provide it within 3 business day after dumping your weights"