Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

67% Positive

Analyzed from 97 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#generated#code#pure#slop#sweet#somebody#book#examining#bunch#read

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

fwlrabout 2 hours ago
Sweet, somebody AI generated a book examining a bunch of AI generated code. I think I’ll have my AI read it for me.
efskapabout 14 hours ago
Easier than reading the source myself, but I don't think the site makes a good case for why I SHOULD apply CC's patterns to my own systems, besides it being the most used harness. It's clearly useful software, but that doesn't _necessarily_ translate to something to learn from.

It is apparently a vibecoded mess: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47772282

AustinDevabout 14 hours ago
Pure slop, completely unadulterated from what I can tell.
oefrhaabout 14 hours ago
Kudos for at least admitting upfront that it’s pure slop, I guess.
Mbarleyabout 14 hours ago
Auditing the actual code would build far more trust than any third-party certification. That's the real win here for security-conscious deployments.