RU version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
0% Positive
Analyzed from 312 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#pretty#problem#file#bit#hardware#around#similar#issue#machines#whole

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
One project I did in 2000 was porting HP-UX software to handle 64 bit file offsets, as it was originally written with 32 bit machines in mind, and the deployment scenario naturally evolved.
There were a bunch of similar problems with hardware device support at around the same time - various BIOS, MBR, and partition size limits affecting 512 GB, 2 GB, and 4 GB disks (I think - my memory is pretty hazy).
Even further back, there was the infamous 32 MB partition limit in DOS 3.3 and earlier, which was still being sold with new machines at a time when 40 MB disks had become standard. Pretty much everyone in the late 80s had an awkward 8 MB D: drive hanging around as a result.
By those standards, the Y2038 problem has been handled ridiculously far in advance!
There are undoubtedly still issues in legacy apps around Y2036/Y2038 waiting to bite us, and further ahead there's likely to be some hangover in 2060/70 from the hacks put in place to deal with the Y2K issue. We might see a small army of centenarian COBOL programmers being paid very handsomely indeed...
In theory laws could be authored requiring entities to register pragmatic assumptions with foreseeable violation dates, so that they can be added to a sorted queue of assumption violations to be crossed.
Sol won’t ever go nova, though, so I’m not sure how one would calculate the number of seconds until that happens.
Y2038, meanwhile, is just an artifact of the limitations of older hardware.