Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

75% Positive

Analyzed from 189 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#security#council#still#https#com#nations#reasonable#video#efforts#own

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

yesco•about 1 hour ago
Tech leaders demand nations of the world give them a moat or else
impossiblefork•34 minutes ago
It's a really strange decision to choose the security council as the forum, given its purpose.

I think the reasonable thing would have been to let some sort of committee of interested countries to have access to a bunch of relevant. It could still be public and in video form.

I like the call for ensuring that AI isn't concentrated in one company or country though. I would be happy if this were followed, with appropriate EU efforts to make good training accelerators etc. so that we could have our own reasonable 10T+ models.

I've poo-pooed the bio stuff earlier, but I think I agree with the threat to some degree, but I still absolutely hate the idea of central control of models, probably because it's still central control.

ChrisArchitect•about 2 hours ago
ChrisArchitect•about 2 hours ago
Alt title from source: Heads of AI firms tell UN Security Council that it could imperil humanity
watwut•34 minutes ago
I mean ... just stop shipping and building it if it is so dangerous. Easy peasy. Perfectly doable by literally you.
no-name-here•30 minutes ago
Is your idea that other groups (who have stated less concerned with AI safety) would stop their own AI efforts of those concerned with AI safety stopped?