ZH version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Tools like ccusage give a cost breakdown per model and per day, but I wanted to understand usage at the task level.
CodeBurn reads the JSONL session transcripts that Claude Code stores locally (~/.claude/projects/) and classifies each turn into 13 categories based on tool usage patterns (no LLM calls involved).
One surprising result: about 56% of my spend was on conversation turns with no tool usage. Actual coding (edits/writes) was only ~21%.
The interface is an interactive terminal UI built with Ink (React for terminals), with gradient bar charts, responsive panels, and keyboard navigation. There’s also a SwiftBar menu bar integration for macOS.
Happy to hear feedback or ideas.

Discussion (11 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
Just like Claude Code btw.
I'm working on a custom harness because I don't like or trust some of the ones out there, so I'm going to build one purely for myself and my own needs to see just how they work, and figure out some of what you've learned by looking at how Claude works, so I might add your project to my list of tooling to look at.
[1] https://github.com/cordwainersmith/Claudoscope
filed an issue to add it: https://github.com/AgentSeal/codeburn/issues/55
cursor support only landed yesterday, so CLI is next. thanks for catching it.
holy slop. the $200/month plan has NEVER hit rate limits for me and I often run 5+ tabs of concurrent agents in a large 300k LoC codebase
In my case I mostly consume every bit of the weekly subscription.