Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 185 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#core#esp#ble#bare#metal#mcu#firmware#wifi#setup#idf

Discussion (4 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

the__alchemistabout 1 hour ago
Very good article!

Anecdote about this summary at the bottom: > This setup gives you the best of both worlds: ESP-IDF and FreeRTOS manage Wi-Fi, BLE, and system tasks on Core 0, while Core 1 runs your bare-metal Rust code at full speed with zero scheduler interference.

I am doing something somewhat like this, but with separate MCUs instead of separate cores. I flashed Esp-Hosted-MCU onto an ESP-32 (C3, but any including S3 will work). This is official firmware which turns the ESP into a "radio co-processor", so you can treat it like a SPI or UART Wi-Fi/BLE chip.

On another MCU (STM32), I run bare-metal firmware in rust which talks to the radio over SPI. Wi-Fi uses the ESP IDF, and BLE uses standard HCI commands.

sottol39 minutes ago
Interestingly, Espressif nowadays does something similar on the ESP32-P4 which is RiscV but doesn't have builtin Wifi/BT. So they tend to pair it with an ESP32-C6 which runs the WiFi stack and firmware that communicates with the P4 using SDIO. Not bare metal though, but similar dual-mcu setup for wifi/bt.
fjfaaseabout 2 hours ago
I think you can run a single task on core 1 without interference if you give it the right priority (and disable some things).
barbegalabout 1 hour ago
Yes you can pin it to core 1 whilst pinning all other tasks to core 0. Then will never be interrupted or preempted (except by interrupts created on core 1)