Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

55% Positive

Analyzed from 4743 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#peaches#trees#fruit#farmers#peach#market#here#don#produce#food

Discussion (149 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

clarionbellabout 2 hours ago
People underestimate how difficult it is to seek buyers for the amount of produce we are talking about here.

Farmers are specialists at growing things, not at moving them across great distances, marketing them to dozens small buyers and or starting up packing plants from scratch. They don't have enough trucks, people or packaging machines to move them around.

Maybe, they can take some portion for local use. But the rest will spoil, and rest of the land will be effectively unused, and a burden. The best option is to cut that as much as possible, and plant something else that actually sells.

Of course, people who never approached agriculture will be appalled at this, and call it great injustice.

Aurornisabout 1 hour ago
A situation like this bring out many comments that reveal a very low understanding of basic economics (and a low rate of reading the article).

Del Monte went out of business because there wasn't enough demand for the peaches. The company that purchased their assets is continuing to buy 24,000 tons of peaches, but the previous unsustainable business was buying a lot more. It's the excess fields that need to be repurposed to growing something that the market will absorb.

The reason the trees are being destroyed is so they can grow something else on the land. Something that comes with a sustainable business model for the current market demands. Yes, the trees are technically going to waste, but if we had forced the peaches to be grown and canned (as many comments are suggesting) then that would be a different kind of waste as they'd sit in warehouses while the land, resources, and labor were used to produce something people weren't buying instead of being used to produce foods they were buying.

In the article you can even see that the farm lobby was so powerful that they got the USDA to pay for the tree removal. The comments talking about farmers not being organized enough or powerful enough must be unaware of how powerful the farm lobby is and how much money they're able to secure from the government every year.

gblargg37 minutes ago
> if we had forced the peaches to be grown and canned (as many comments are suggesting) then that would be a different kind of waste as they'd sit in warehouses while the land, resources, and labor were used to produce something people weren't buying instead of being used to produce foods they were buying.

Worse, the price would have to be lowered to bring up sales, which could put the other peach farmers into bankruptcy as well.

HoldOnAMinuteabout 1 hour ago
The new crop will be grapes of wrath
msarrel40 minutes ago
The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all. Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. How would they buy oranges at twenty cents a dozen if they could drive out and pick them up? And men with hoses squirt kerosene on the oranges, and they are angry at the crime, angry at the people who have come to take the fruit. A million people hungry, needing the fruit- and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains. And the smell of rot fills the country. Burn coffee for fuel in the ships. Burn corn to keep warm, it makes a hot fire. Dump potatoes in the rivers and place guards along the banks to keep the hungry people from fishing them out. Slaughter the pigs and bury them, and let the putrescence drip down into the earth.

There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate- died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot. The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.

rf1542 minutes ago
> A situation like this bring out many comments that reveal a very low understanding of basic economics (and a low rate of reading the article).

And a very low understanding of basic biology. A bunch of rotten fruit is _exceptionally valuable_ in many parts of the world. There's a million things you can do with it, alcohol, fertilizer...

edit: me right now I'm in a position where I could really use truckloads of rotten, inedible peaches if I could get them for free. Trying to figure out the most economic way to get a rather barren place some soil.

gdhkgdhkvff18 minutes ago
If rotten fruit was exceptionally valuable, then people would be paying exceptional amounts of money for it instead of wondering where they can get truckloads of it for free.
yread12 minutes ago
Someone needs to put them in tanks for long time and make something very valuable like this:

https://en.excaliburshop.com/catalog/item/8951/fleret-merunk...

phkahler7 minutes ago
Reminds me of stories about McDonalds introducing new menu items. The logistics of introducing things at all their locations is a major concern. Maybe they could have introduced a new peach desert or something, but like you said supply isn't the only thing - you need to move them around and process them too.
munk-aabout 2 hours ago
I agree that the tree destruction is a perfectly rationale reaction - but it is still an injustice. This quantity of waste is not free and not fully priced into the cost to produce the fruit.

I think the emotional misalignment most people will feel at this announcement is a signal that there's a large missed externality that allowed margins on this produce to get too thin.

modelessabout 1 hour ago
A big part of the problem here is that Del Monte was the victim of several leveraged buyouts that had executives walking away with millions while the company was saddled with debt.
BrenBarn33 minutes ago
Exactly. That is what is missing in this discussion. If you want to cut down the trees, fine, but those people who profited should pay for it.
private_nrgabout 1 hour ago
Paging user JumpCrisscross to vehemently defend these actions and tell us that "private equity is when a company does something that we don't like".
quickthrowman2 minutes ago
It’s an injustice to destroy orchards of commercially planted fruit trees that were bathed in pesticides for their entire life? I’m not seeing the injustice here, something else will be planted in place of the peach trees. It’s productive agricultural land.
PowerElectronixabout 1 hour ago
They will be replaced with something else, don't feel bad for the trees, they had a good run.
oldsecondhand33 minutes ago
Did they? How long have they been around?
baggy_troughabout 1 hour ago
I don't know what you mean by 'injustice' - it seems to be a proxy for 'I don't like it when trees die'. Is there more?
wahnfriedenabout 1 hour ago
It’s not missed. Unpaid externalities are the whole game.
ghastmaster20 minutes ago
> Maybe, they can take some portion for local use. But the rest will spoil, and rest of the land will be effectively unused, and a burden. The best option is to cut that as much as possible, and plant something else that actually sells.

A negative of the subsidy is that the farmland is not going to hit the market at a much lower rate. That raises the bar for entry into farming or at least keeps the bar at some level higher than the market would have had it.

dylan604about 1 hour ago
> and call it great injustice.

The great injustice is very much me paying however much per pound of peaches when the supply is so great that they should be much cheaper.

However, if these are the trees that grow rock hard peaches that never soften as they ripen with no flavor, then bulldoze them all and say good riddance. Hell, might as well take of and nuke 'em from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

brailsafe16 minutes ago
You want BC Okanagan peaches. I've found them to be dramatically better than anything that's come out of the states for some reason. Granted, most of those would probably be coming from the western half of the country
dragonwriter22 minutes ago
> The great injustice is very much me paying however much per pound of peaches when the supply is so great that they should be much cheaper.

But its not, because the supply and competing demands for motor fuel and all the other things that are required between the orchard are involved, not just the supply of peaches at the orchard.

quotzabout 1 hour ago
When I moved to the US from southern Europe I was so horrified by the lack of taste of any fruit I tried, particularly the peaches and plums. I moved back to Europe and not a small factor was the lack of good produce and food in general. Its just mind boggling how Americans dont revolt against this, stop buying shit produce and suppliers will notice.
kstrauserabout 1 hour ago
That's so odd to me. You can buy cheap, cost-optimized fruit in the US. You can also buy amazing produce that would blow your mind. My wife and I look forward to our annual road trip to Monterey partly because of the fruit stands we pass along the way where we'll get cherries so dark they're nearly black, and strawberries the size of my fist (no, really, I have pictures) that are sweet as sugar and incredibly delicious.

The existence of Subway doesn't mean you can't get phenomenal deli sandwiches. It does mean you probably need to look around a little more and don't settle for the first sandwich place you see.

boringg22 minutes ago
This is a funny statement in that California has probably the best agricultural produce on the planet. If you were in say Texas or Georgia - you could be forgiven for your statement.

Bay area produce is unparalleled - Tomatoes, peaches, figs, strawberries, etc.

More organic growers if thats what you care about - high quality growers. There is also massive commercial growers doing high volume low cost but you do need to know where to look.

dylan60413 minutes ago
I've stopped buying peaches from the supermarkets. They just are not worth it. To get peaches with actual flavor, I have to get them from special vendors that know they have better peaches and charge accordingly.

The suppliers don't notice when the numbers that stop are rounding errors. The vast majority of people don't have any experience with anything other than supermarket produce and don't know there's a choice. Growing up as a kid, I didn't know there were so many varieties of apples. Our store only carried red delicious, golden, and granny smith. It wasn't until I moved out of the sticks and saw more varieties. Some people never move, so they only know what they know and never experience new

psadauskas12 minutes ago
Same with Maui Gold pineapples. I can't eat the Dole crap you get everywhere else. The ones at the markets in Maui are a completely different fruit, they're like candy. Whenever I go I eat them until my tongue burns from the citric acid.

This is what happens when you optimize your food supply for profit instead of being edible; varieties are selected for yield, longevity and shipping rather than flavor or nutrients. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.

janalsncm16 minutes ago
You are comparing fruit in a prime stone fruit-growing region to the US.

The US is big and fruit needs to be refrigerated to be transported. Refrigeration kills aromatics.

I assume you would have a similar experience buying plums in Germany. Similarly, if you bought stone fruit in California where it is grown, it would taste good.

> stop buying shit produce and suppliers will notice

Unless you are willing to pay $30/peach for them to be flown next day on a jet, peaches in New York are not going to taste as good as they do off the tree.

doubled112about 1 hour ago
My understanding is that it's all bred to be easier and faster to grow. Flavour isn't first in the value equation.
uncletammy28 minutes ago
It's hard to vote with your dollar when market economics are such that only a handful of (massive) firms sell almost all of thing you're protesting. What leverage does one have in the age of oligopolistic enshittification?
NoMoreNicksLeft27 minutes ago
>However, if these are the trees that grow rock hard peaches that never soften as they ripen with no flavor, t

That's not even how trees work. If they wanted, those same trees could grow plums within 2 years, or almonds, or pretty much any stonefruit except cherries (which tend to be incompatible).

brailsafe17 minutes ago
Yes, trees are magical, but there are better peaches to grow of these are the ones being grown
dylan60422 minutes ago
Then please explain to me how trees work.
heathrow8382937 minutes ago
the difficulty of bringing produce to market is reflected in the cost structure. 90% of a food dollar goes towards all the efforts required to get food to the customer (transportation, packaging, warehousing, marketing, retail, etc).

this is why I think the solution is to have people grow their own fruits in their own backyards and front yards. customers will save a huge amount of money and it's better for the environment too.

navigate831010 minutes ago
No one is stopping customers from growing their own food. What's stopping is the lack of expertise knowledge and time commitments it takes to harvest.
boringg26 minutes ago
I mean you are destroying an entire forest that grows food, of course people are incensed, they are funding the destruction with money paid from taxes. Food is already bananas expensive.

I fully understand that there is processing and logistics problems. This is an understanding of economics - its a wild misallocation of resources, and massive destruction of crop.

Have a banner year of peach sales in California for super cheap... market corrects for its past mistakes.

BloondAndDoom43 minutes ago
As someone close to agriculture this is the only true response in this thread and anyone understand fruit business knows this.
hnthrow0287345about 2 hours ago
In a less profit driven world, we might stockpile these in cans and then later throw them away once they spoil, taking over the canning facilities and paying for the wages via taxes on things not needed for survival. We don't maximize food security though, we prefer profit, up to and including choosing not to feed people.
tracker1about 1 hour ago
That's how we got mountain bunkers filled with cheese over the course of decades.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvLMH0wb_0k

hamdingers27 minutes ago
And how we ended up feeding roughly a third of US-grown corn to cars.
hnthrow0287345about 1 hour ago
Of course if they did then what's about to happen with the peach trees, you'd end up killing the dairy cows, which I'm guessing the people in this thread would have a problem with.
xboxnolifesabout 1 hour ago
Farmers are literally subsidized to over-produce for food security.
hnthrow0287345about 1 hour ago
Which of course is not enough due to other expenses:

https://www.fb.org/market-intel/farm-bankruptcies-continued-...

https://www.adamsandreese.com/the-ledger/rising-farm-distres...

And those farms get bought up and folded into for-profit operations. You simply can't fix this in the current system.

hluskaabout 1 hour ago
Uh yeah, this was Del Monte’s business model.

The issue is that the company that owns the canning plants (Del Monte) went bankrupt. There is no canning capacity available to do this.

How did you possibly miss the point by this far? It’s like trying to drive to Los Angeles and ending up on Pluto.

hnthrow0287345about 1 hour ago
The government would step in and take over operations. This is why we don't need profit-driven companies responsible for food supply. By all means let Del Monte's managers try their hand in some other industry if they couldn't make it work (or not, because they couldn't make it work).
unglaublichabout 2 hours ago
It's difficult for them because farmers are raised anti-union individualists that are at the mercy of middle-men. If they would cooperate, unionize even, they would be far more powerful than they are now.
munk-aabout 1 hour ago
US farmers are up there in terms of how much business protection exists for them. I do think there were policy issues and recent political extremism has diverted a lot of their political will from the matters that are critical to them - but this sort of an issue is larger than just collectivizing. Agriculture is a global market that is uncoordinateable (at least without massive effort) and so if local protections are to be offered the costs will need to be artificially introduced through domestic price increases that the larger American market finds extremely unpalatable.

This is a failing where a lack of coordinated collectivized action was one contributing factor but there is actually a large collectivized will here - but I think the bigger issue is that it's having difficulty aligning itself in the current political environment.

modelessabout 1 hour ago
I'm sorry, but this is completely wrong. California canning peach farmers are organized and crop prices are set by industry-wide bargaining with processors every year. Additionally, now that Del Monte is out of the business, the only remaining operating canneries are owned by a grower cooperative. It didn't save the industry. In fact, it may have led to the irrational planting of these trees that now need to be pulled. Source: my father was a peach farmer and chairman of the board of the California Canning Peach Association for many years. But he saw this coming and got out of the business.
Modified3019about 1 hour ago
I’m an agronomist and while I don’t directly deal with that level of things, what you wrote sounds roughly like what goes on for the hazelnut industry here in Oregon.

https://www.hazelnutbargaining.com/

bix6about 1 hour ago
He saw demand falling or what? What did he swap to?
hluskaabout 1 hour ago
Farmers generally own or lease their land. How and why would the owner or leaseholder of the land unionize? Who would they be negotiating with collectively? On the other hand, many farmers are parts of pools that pool their crops and sell them all into commodities markets.

I don’t think you have a clue what you’re talking about. And it’s a shame; unions actually deserve better representation than you just provided.

bix6about 2 hours ago
Clingstone peaches are best used for canning and this is one of the last canneries shutting down. The remaining CA cannery is buying what it can. This helps them remove now worthless trees and plant new crops. But it will take a generation to recover.
oxag3nabout 2 hours ago
That's what happens when "family farms" rely on a large industrial complex and grow a mono-culture that doesn't have uses other than canning.

It was an easy, steady cash-positive business until it wasn't. If those farmers thought what is final product and who benefits from it most, they'd grow diversified crops to sell locally, which many California family farms do.

pinkmuffinereabout 2 hours ago
> they'd grow diversified crops to sell locally

This is out of touch, many of these farmers are 100+ miles from a large population center. They can’t move enough produce at a local store to stay in business.

goosejuiceabout 1 hour ago
Maybe, but it's not an argument against diversification. When it comes to agriculture, the incentives should be aligned such that a single point of failure like this is highly unlikely.

That's not to say it's an easy problem to solve.

sophaclesabout 1 hour ago
And conversely you can't grow enough food local to a large population center to feed everyone.
TimorousBestieabout 1 hour ago
Christopher Alexander figured this one out in A Pattern Language:

https://www.patternlanguageindex.com/patterns/city-country-f...

baggy_troughabout 2 hours ago
> If those farmers thought what is final product and who benefits from it most, they'd grow diversified crops to sell locally, which many California family farms do.

What if they can't make much money doing so?

hluskaabout 1 hour ago
> It was an easy, steady cash-positive business until it wasn't.

This is out of touch. Growing fruit is one of the most difficult tasks in farming.

fred_is_fredabout 2 hours ago
Farmers care about making money.
munk-aabout 1 hour ago
And farmers that don't care about making money aren't farmers any more.

Agriculture is a highly competitive business - even large scale agriculture still has very stiff price competition. There isn't a lot of fat to burn on charitable gestures and what is there isn't on the scale of maintaining such a large unproductive orchard.

It sucks - don't misread my statement. It is deeply unfortunate and we should consider mitigations for the future - but the party to throw blame at here isn't the farmers and neither should they be expected to bear the cost.

delichonabout 2 hours ago
This is your fault for eating fewer canned peaches. The clingstone variety is bred for canning and not well suited to eating fresh.
Lercabout 2 hours ago
My fault? I'm blaming The Presidents of the United States of America.
Bichoteabout 2 hours ago
Millions of peaches, peaches for m̶e̶ no-one -> https://youtu.be/3GCrzjVdmSg
busterarmabout 1 hour ago
Peaches come from a can. They were put there by a man.
BloondAndDoom43 minutes ago
If you are in agriculture you understand how expensive to move things, as crazy as this sounds it’s practically only option many times.

Easy way to understand, they can announce it’s free come and get it and it wouldn’t have moved. Which clearly shows financially moving these don’t make sense.

lifis19 minutes ago
Why? From searches and LLMs it seems it costs $50-100 to move a tonne 1000 km via truck, giving 0.05-0.10 $/kg for a supermarket 500km away. Fruit prices at at least $4.5/kg for peaches, 3.75$/kg for apples 1.45$/kg. So transport cost seems negligible and if fruit is given away for free, it seems it would be very profitable for any supermarket in region to show up with a truck. What's missing in this analysis?
VladVladikoffabout 2 hours ago
Some local meat smoker is going to be very happy about all that peach wood. holy smokes!
rented_muleabout 1 hour ago
There's a good chance of that, yes! Farmers tend to be very good at getting every bit of value out of things. I live in the Sierras, uphill from many of these peach trees. Near the peach trees are lots and lots of almond trees. Almond trees are rotated (removed and replaced with young trees) every couple of decades or so, so 3-5% are taken out every year.

A lot of the removed almond tree wood is sold to people like me up in the Sierras where we heat with it in the winter. Almond has significantly more energy per unit of volume that most other species of trees in our area. I don't like the smell of burning almond wood. I bet peach wood smells a lot better, but it would take a lot more space to store the same energy.

trollbridgeabout 1 hour ago
This is rapidly changing. As almond orchards get taken over by corporate farmers instead of smaller family farmers, they just chip the almond wood and discard it instead of dealing with waiting for various people to come in and get the almond wood.

(Source: my relatives in the Sac. Valley don’t heat with almond wood anymore.)

toast0about 1 hour ago
A lot of people are using pellet stoves/bbq; seems like you could sell the chipped wood to someone?
snapetomabout 1 hour ago
That's going to make for some very interesting smoked cheeses. I'd love to try a smoked brie with this wood.
Cakez0r27 minutes ago
It seems that del monte proper is not actually declaring bankruptcy, so how is it that the American tax payer is left picking up the check on this one? Privatized profits, socialized losses!
fckgw20 minutes ago
The money isn't going to Del Monte, it's going to their suppliers. The ones who lost money when Del Monte closed.
Cakez0r13 minutes ago
Yes, i have no issue with that, but why is the money coming from the tax payer instead of del monte?
ryandrakeabout 2 hours ago
> When a processing facility closes and 55,000 acres of fruit suddenly have nowhere to go — that’s not something a family farm can just absorb

Won't they at least sell the fruit to customers through grocery stores, where possible? I can see replacing the crops based on reduced future demand from the canneries, but surely the current fruit is usable.

AngryDataabout 2 hours ago
From what I understand it is a canning variety of peach that isn't all that great for eating fresh. So while im sure they could sell some, I doubt most people would come back for much more after the first time.
jandrewrogersabout 2 hours ago
It is common in agriculture that there is no existing market in which the price would cover the cost of moving the crop to that market. Destroying the crop minimizes the loss to the farmer.
ryandrakeabout 1 hour ago
Reminds me of Steinbeck:

“The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all. Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. How would they buy oranges at twenty cents a dozen if they could drive out and pick them up? And men with hoses squirt kerosene on the oranges, and they are angry at the crime, angry at the people who have come to take the fruit. A million people hungry, needing the fruit- and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains. And the smell of rot fills the country. Burn coffee for fuel in the ships. Burn corn to keep warm, it makes a hot fire. Dump potatoes in the rivers and place guards along the banks to keep the hungry people from fishing them out. Slaughter the pigs and bury them, and let the putrescence drip down into the earth.

There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate- died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot. The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.”

afavourabout 2 hours ago
How would they establish those relationships with grocery stores, and get the peaches to them? Sure you could do it with a handful of local stores but the numbers we're talking about are a rounding error.
somatabout 1 hour ago
I assume there is market saturation for fresh peaches, that is, all the fresh peaches the market wants to buy are already in the market.
ErroneousBoshabout 1 hour ago
How many kilos of peaches would you say you get through in an average day?
munk-aabout 1 hour ago
Ah so the real problem here is the loneliness epidemic. If yall were less shy and came over more often to share my home baked peach cobbler then this wouldn't be an issue!
roxolotlabout 2 hours ago
Nothing new here

“ The works of the roots of the vines, of the trees, must be destroyed to keep up the price, and this is the saddest, bitterest thing of all. Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. How would they buy oranges at twenty cents a dozen if they could drive out and pick them up? And men with hoses squirt kerosene on the oranges, and they are angry at the crime, angry at the people who have come to take the fruit. A million people hungry, needing the fruit- and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains. And the smell of rot fills the country. Burn coffee for fuel in the ships. Burn corn to keep warm, it makes a hot fire. Dump potatoes in the rivers and place guards along the banks to keep the hungry people from fishing them out. Slaughter the pigs and bury them, and let the putrescence drip down into the earth.

There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate- died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot. The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.” - John Steinbeck; Grapes of Wrath

linkregisterabout 2 hours ago
I loved reading Grapes of Wrath in high school. How is this related to the topic?

This reaction is similar to constituents who bristle at the fact that their local library destroys old books, seeing a parallel to book burnings in 1930s Germany.

sys_6473843 minutes ago
The Man from Del Monte said No?
scherlockabout 2 hours ago
So, they cut down the trees and do what? How is this supposed help anything?
CobrastanJorjiabout 2 hours ago
The problem for the individual farmers is that they own a farm covered in peach trees, but they can't profitably sell peaches. The money will let them remove all the peach trees and then develop the land for some new crop.

This is also good for the remaining peach farmers because it keeps peach prices high, and also because massive forests of unattended peach trees leads to pest problems.

modelessabout 1 hour ago
They plant something else. There just isn't demand for canned peaches anymore, so this is exactly what should happen. It's just unfortunate that it had to happen all at once with this bankruptcy rather than in a more organized fashion that could have prevented these unneeded orchards from being planted in the first place.
fred_is_fredabout 2 hours ago
Significantly reduced water usage for one. The water is the limiting factor.
hparadizabout 1 hour ago
It's really not. https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/

California is not in any drought right now and our reservoirs last 10 years in the absolute worst case. Most of our water goes into the ocean.

I have no dog in the race in terms of what trees there are but if you take them down it'll be invasive South American pepper trees or mustard grass. As long as it's used and sequestering carbon it's all gravy.

bix6about 1 hour ago
10 years? Says who? I’ve heard 2 years in a worst case.
Advertisement
bell-cotabout 2 hours ago
While SFGate probably isn't renowned for its agricultural coverage, it'd be nice if there was at least a little context in their story. Is the demand for canned peaches dropping, or is production from other regions or countries displacing the California production, or what? What new crops might the farmers replace the trees with? Are there Peach Festivals or other local cultural events which will be impacted?
LeoPantheraabout 2 hours ago
Del Monte was killed by COVID. Canned food sales spiked and they thought that would last, but it didn't.

The specific peaches referred to in this story are "Cling peaches", which can only be canned, they aren't sold fresh. But modern supply chains mean fresh peaches of other varieties are easily available, which has reduced the demand for canned.

They'll probably replace the trees with almonds, pistachios, and walnuts.

namenotrequiredabout 2 hours ago
Thanks for your answers!

> Del Monte was killed by COVID. Canned food sales spiked and they thought that would last, but it didn't.

Why can’t they reduce to their former size? It seems the California plants had been around long before Covid

bombcarabout 2 hours ago
Debt financing means you can basically never reduce back down, the debt load kills you (as it did here).

If anything would have been profitable spun off, it would have been spun off in the bankruptcy.

LeoPantheraabout 2 hours ago
They permanently closed their Modesto and Hughson canneries in early 2026, and voided 20-year contracts with around 70 California cling peach growers.
bestouffabout 2 hours ago
But but ... the Free Market magic hand will solve this !
ch4s3about 2 hours ago
> The impacts pushed a delegation of California lawmakers to ask the U.S. Department of Agriculture to provide financial support to the fruit growers.

Seems like the opposite of the free market. Large farmers are usually the first people lining up for a government handout, and their representatives are regularly anti-market types.

bdangubicabout 2 hours ago
this is exactly right, all US farmers are basically socialists and they consistently vote for the one of the most socialists parties on the planet - the republican party
ch4s314 minutes ago
We have 2 anti-capitalist parties right now that shower largess on on their favored interests.
nkriscabout 1 hour ago
They’re selectively socialist.
baggy_troughabout 2 hours ago
Isn't that what is happening, minus the government assistance?
bell-cotabout 2 hours ago
The U.S. has not had any sort of Free Market in agricultural products since at least 1942 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn

Sure, there's plenty of puffed-up talk about having one. That's kinda like the talk about Santa bringing toys for good little girls and boys.

lenerdenatorabout 2 hours ago
The Free Market magic hand™ does not apply to those who have capital and are facing losses. That's only when you don't have capital and are facing losses.
skybrianabout 2 hours ago
Did Del Monte's investors and lenders lose money? It would be strange if they didn't.
lenerdenatorabout 2 hours ago
This is more in reference to the farmers.
1970-01-01about 2 hours ago
I wonder why they cannot be moved. There are machines that simply pluck them from the dirt and have them ready to go. They could auction them off for $1/each and still make a profit.

https://interestingengineering.com/lists/7-mighty-machines-f...

tengbretson35 minutes ago
The land is the thing that is actually valuable here, so filling that land with a perfect grid of 6 foot craters in exchange for a few dollars is probably a bad call.
modelessabout 1 hour ago
The problem isn't that the trees are in the wrong place. The problem is that there are more trees than demand for canned peaches. It's a failure of planning on the part of Del Monte and peach growers.
oldsecondhand21 minutes ago
Covid boosted the sale of canned food, but people avoid the sugary syrup of canned fruits in non emergency situations.
GenerocUsernameabout 2 hours ago
I agree in principle that reuse is the best imaginable outcome... but You underestimate the labor and cost of machines. I bet it costs $200 to pluck a single tree let alone ship it somewhere else usable.
1970-01-01about 1 hour ago
Why would they pay to ship it anywhere? Set the auction date and mandate the buyer brings a flatbed. All sales final. The work to remove the dead tree stump isn't going to be cheaper.