Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

73% Positive

Analyzed from 4704 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#power#more#energy#crank#human#https#using#need#scroll#watts

Discussion (236 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

zahlman6 days ago
The webpage linked is an example of everything I wish people would stop doing in web design.

Fortunately, at the bottom there is a link to the "technical documentation" (https://squeezlabs.github.io/handcrank/) which is vastly improved (aside from being light-mode-only and linked from a dark-mode-only marketing page). It also gives me much more interesting information (specifically: models that can apparently run acceptably on a Pi 5).

Please let me read your content with a scrollbar that works the way scroll bars are supposed to, rather than turning everything into a weird slide show where you don't actually know when the next slide is coming. Please let me just click on buttons that look like links to more information, without JavaScript.

alansaber6 days ago
Why can't technical people appreciate that us, the silent majority, love having our scroll hijacked? I can't remember the last time I used a scroll bar to navigate a website, but using it to navigate between choppy javascript keyframes fills me with joy.
lelandfe6 days ago
This isn’t scroll hijacking

You can scroll normally, with all your favorite keys, or go super fast to the bottom

It’s just scroll animations. Bad ones, admittedly.

mrandish6 days ago
> just scroll animations. Bad ones

Scroll animations, post-grid floating voids, bouncy house dampening, hyper rounded... everything. These are the 50s Chevy fins of today.

I've enjoyed working with some great designers over the years, Stanford D-School and even wild-raised. All the good ones intuitively steered clear of trends destined to be era-stamp tropes. They'd say, "I can already hear the ghosts of design-future mocking me: 'That's so early-AI' and 'Yo, the mid-20s called and wants their bento grid back.'"

cj6 days ago
> You can scroll normally

Except you can’t.

I scroll down, and the content of the page doesn’t move as expected.

ProllyInfamous6 days ago
Just use your page_up/page_down keys, and you can skip all the stupid/excessive scrolling requirements.
butlike6 days ago
If they're not scroll hijacking, then we're just jacking it ourselves. Think about it.

Thanks, web designers <3

lukan6 days ago
"love having our scroll hijacked? "

You are the silent majority?

No doubt non technical people have different UX experience than tech nerd, but I have seen plenty of "normal" people curse at artsy fluffy design, that made known navigation skills useless and nobody likes their time wasted.

latexr6 days ago
Pretty sure your parent comment was being sarcastic. Why else would they write “choppy javascript keyframes fills me with joy”?
loire2806 days ago
I agree this type of web design sucks. It's been common for more than a decade - I remember Apple getting criticized for using this on the product page for the old "trash can" Mac Pro in 2013, and it was already widely used back then.

However, it seems pretty clear to me they did this in service of a joke - you have to "crank" your scroll wheel to get to the content, just like you have to crank this device. I think it's funny...

zahlman5 days ago
> you have to "crank" your scroll wheel to get to the content, just like you have to crank this device.

I actually didn't consider that interpretation.

(I also almost deleted the comment, definitely didn't expect it to blow up like this.)

gchamonlive6 days ago
Calling this web design is giving it too much credit. This is just a glorified marketing pamphlet, which is fine for its purpose.
Chrise_N6 days ago
boo wendy boo. i liked it.
gchamonlive5 days ago
Who's Wendy?
niko3236 days ago
Great prop for a Black Mirror episode about AI use in a post-apocalyptic world. Everywhere you go, all you hear is brrrrr..brrr..brrrr followed by people mumbling.
SunshineTheCat5 days ago
Choosing "form over function" has been the hallmark of bad design since flash and I don't see that tradition changing anytime soon, even with AI.
pbronez6 days ago
Yeah this is a better link https://squeezlabs.github.io/handcrank/
squarefoot6 days ago
Totally agree on the atrocious landing page. The technical one is much better, although the power supply circuit by using a resistive balancer and a linear regulator wastes some good power for nothing.
larodi6 days ago
Twas probably also prompted… to pile irony over...
trueno6 days ago
yea i can't stand this. im not so boomer i want every webpage to be like. times new roman white background and just using <p></p> and bulleted lists, but idk i cant even put a finger on what im not enjoying here. think it's possibly using scrolling as a way to try and force me to read through stuff. jokes on them, i can't read. not giving me the agency to click around into info that interests me drives me nuts, chances are im just gonna keep scrolling at 1000mph and eye scan until i see what im looking for virtually zero chance im going to sit through the experience of every carefully designed scroll-slide they've tried to present to me here.
duskdozer5 days ago
Alright, I'll be the boomer and say that's what I want every webpage to be like. If you want to customize it you can bring your own CSS or download someone else's. The modern web is a nightmare of user-hostile time-thieving behavioral manipulation and our brains would be better off without it.
neonstatic6 days ago
This website is satire, right?

P.S. I agree with you 100%

kowbell6 days ago
My partner just got a rowing machine that offered "watts" as a unit of how hard you're going (like "calories" or "mph") and got me wondering if they made rowing machines that could slowly charge a battery, and how much I'd need to row to power one of them fancy newfangled M5 Max MacBooks answering prompts.

All that to say, CrankGPT, I am your target demographic and if you don't respond to my request for a demo I'll be cranking my keyboard with bad reviews online. Or cranking a rowing machine that powers an LLM to do it for me. Wait...

meindnoch6 days ago
For reference, this is what 700W cycling looks like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4O5voOCqAQ
eks3916 days ago
I took several biomechanics classes as electives back in my undergrad, and in one assignment I remember comparing the energy outputs between the human and robot equivalents of different tasks, whether or not the robot was humanoid in how it was designed. The most impressive think that stuck with me is that humans are incredibly efficient, from an energy perspective, in anything we do, compared to machines. Every time we delegate a task to a machine, we are using several orders of magnitude of energy to do the same thing. For most tasks, it feels wrong, but it doesn't make me any more willing to give up my car. Maybe if I lived outside the US.
overfeed6 days ago
> The most impressive think that stuck with me is that humans are incredibly efficient, from an energy perspective, in anything we do, compared to machines.

Humans are efficient, but not across the board. Trivial counterexample: walking is incredibly energy inefficient vs a bicycle or other wheeled conveyances whose primary dissipater is rolling resistance.

connicpu6 days ago
If you live in most places in the US other than the urban heart of a few very large cities you have to take a huge hit to your ability to get places in a reasonable time frame without a car. I have hope some more cities other than NYC are improving the situation, but as it is the closest I got to using public transit for a commute was when I was going to one of our other offices in a different downtown area I would drive my car to the park n ride to take the train the rest of the way. The train saves time and sanity because traffic downtown is a nightmare, but that drive takes 5 minutes, and it would add 20+ minutes if I had to walk to the closest bus stop so I could take the bus up to the train station.
rahimnathwani6 days ago
"Every time we delegate a task to a machine, we are using several orders of magnitude of energy to do the same thing."

Might this just be selection bias? I mean, if humans can't do a task efficiently, we're not going to do the comparison with a machine.

Some actions we do seem (to me) very inefficient when compared with machines. For example: grating carrots and brushing teeth.

klaff5 days ago
I have the opposite idea after reading physiology books. The number I remember was 22%, for efficiency of a human being as a motor, driving pedals to create mechanical power. That's quite poor compared to an electric motor. And unless you want your fuel to be high-fructose corn syrup, your fuel is inefficient to make as well.
not_the_fda5 days ago
The efficient mode of transportation is a human on a bicycle.
pants26 days ago
If you're comparing raw calories to output, yes. Even gasoline has a caloric value, but humans can't drink gasoline. Growing and preparing food for human consumption uses a lot more energy than pumping and refining gasoline, so at the end of the day, human efficiency gains are not that impressive.
layer86 days ago
Unfortunately, humans want houses and cars and vacations and such, which makes them very expensive. ;)
oneshtein6 days ago
> humans are incredibly efficient

Humans cannot fly.

thewebguyd6 days ago
For more reference how insane 700W is, the average FTP of a world tour pro road cyclist (i.e., Tour de France) is ~350-420W/6-7W/kg. FTP (Functional Threshold Power) being the avg you can sustain for an hour without fatiguing.

My own is ~250W @ 3.12W/kg. I can't even hit 700W yet, let alone for over a minute. My 5 second power is ~640W.

Crazy numbers.

ProllyInfamous6 days ago
Can you still touch your toes? I doubt Robert could... hopefully your own practice leaves you more balanced.
SoftTalker6 days ago
A trained powerlifter probably exerts a few kW on a heavy lift, but only for a second or two.
ProllyInfamous6 days ago
I am a nerdy blue collar electrician and that was incredibly interesting. Only 0.002kWH from that beast of a cyclist.

I would suspect my equivalency to be about 1/3rd a Robert [unit of measure from vidlink].

Tostino6 days ago
I'm sure he could have generated way more total energy if he wasn't trying to get get that max power.
beached_whale6 days ago
1hp/750W or so sustained is insane power for all but a few and that is still for relatively short time periods.
zozbot2346 days ago
1HP sustained is not insane for a horse. A human OTOH is a very different matter.
gwbas1c6 days ago
When I was 11 or 12 I powered an incandescent bulb with an exercise bicycle. I think it was 40 or 60 watts. I can totally understand why that guy was exhausted: 60 watts wasn't hard for me, because I used to ride uphill every day after school, but the other kids could only get a dim glow.
thm6 days ago
I can do 300W for 30mins - does that mean I can barely heat up a Pop-Tart?
simondotau6 days ago
Spend 30 minutes charging a battery and you should have enough energy to turn any flavour of pop-tart into carbon flavour.

Even without a battery, I could easily imagine designing an efficient single slice toaster that could handily brown a pop tart on a 300W budget.

ProllyInfamous6 days ago
That actually could toast a few batches of Pop-Tarts.

If you like then "golden," perhaps the entire box.

WaitWaitWha6 days ago
... at 1:03 he hits steady 700W. At 1:29 shows they kept increasing the incline at least to 40 degrees. Why not keep it at the same incline? . . .
herzigma5 days ago
It was hard to see from the video, but I suspect the machine he was on increases resistance as pedal speed decreases to try and keep him at a constant output.

That's a pretty common device for elite fitness testing.

kccqzy6 days ago
It’s basically well known to cyclists that training with a power meter that tells you “watts” more accurately gauges effort and caloric expenditure. (Heart rate gauges subjective effort however, taking into account stress, caffeine intake, etc.)

It’s also interesting that the industry has settled on using watts to mean rate of useful work whereas calories to mean the total work including inefficiencies, despite that calories is just a unit of energy. A rule of thumb for cyclists is that in addition to usual unit conversions, the “calories” figure should be multiplied by four to account for energy expended by the body but not used for rotating the pedals. I don’t use rowing machines but I’m sure they would have a similar conversion factor in order to calculate calories.

andy_ppp6 days ago
You can get a dynamo hub front wheel for push bikes: https://bikepacking.com/plan/dynamo-hubs-lighting-charging-g...

However you can expect around only 3 watts of output at normal speeds and you will need to put in around 5-7 watts of power for the same speed. This is barely enough to trickle charge modern phones.

Theodores6 days ago
Annoying. Blame the Germans and their lighting laws for bicycles. I want human powered USB-C with enough oomph to power a modest sound system or lights, whilst charging my phone. The allure of USB-C is what interests me, but 3W is not much to work with. Also annoying, no rear dynamo for my bike, so I can't even double up to 6W.

I will probably end up with no sound system and just expensive dynamo lights, using a USB speaker that doubles up as a power brick.

There is a nice USB battery kit for dynamo that fits in the steerer, so it is soldering iron time for that, so might as well learn how to do USB-C power things.

One day there will be structural solar panel batteries that can be 3D printed into lightweight bicycle frames, so maybe I will stick to throwaway lights until then!

forlorn_mammoth6 days ago
> power a modest sound system

please don't inflict your music on everyone around you.

dktoao6 days ago
Some of the bottle style ones claim to go up to 6W, they would also be easier to double or triple up. They are not nearly as nice and efficient as the hub dynamos though
toasty2286 days ago
> offered "watts" as a unit of how hard you're going (like "calories" or "mph")

It's the only unit that makes sense tbh

mrweasel6 days ago
> got me wondering if they made rowing machines that could slowly charge a battery

The Concept2 rowing machines can power itself using the power you generate by rowing, so we're partly there.

nic5476 days ago
The "Low Tech Magazine" has a guide to building a DIY bike generator https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2022/03/how-to-build-a-pra...

Unfortunately even with the bike it seems like you really need to find one machine that can be repurposed, a rowing machine seems a bit of a stretch.

kkkqkqkqkqlqlql6 days ago
Soon enough we will see rowing machines rated in max TFLOPS.
alex7o6 days ago
We already get TFLOP per watt so you can compute how much flops you are doing while cycling
smallpipe6 days ago
A fairly untrained cyclist is usually able to maintain 200W, so yes this is definitely possible
malfist6 days ago
An untrained cyclist is not able to maintain 200 watts.

For an average untrained male cyclist who is 175lb, they should be able to maintain 1.5-2 w/kg over an hour, or 120-160watts. A beginner cyclist who's been cycling recreationally over over a year should be able to attain 2-2.5w/kg which is 160-200 watts. A recreational cyclist who's be training for several years should be able to maintain 200 watts.

Trust me, I'm a cyclist, and I cycle with a power meter.

kowbell6 days ago
As an average male who is ~175lbs and untrained at cycling, this is hugely validating for my terrible idea; 140 watts is the max charging speed for 16" M5 MacBooks. I can finally stop thinking for myself and have my computer do it all for me, powered by my big beefy legs.
malfist6 days ago
Just one more follow up and I'll be done, promise. The average power output (FTP) of someone on zwift, a indoor cycling game, is a whooping 185 watts.
kccqzy6 days ago
I just rode with an untrained cyclist (new to cycling) yesterday. The person averaged 80W over five hours. It’s about right for an actual untrained cyclist.
markb1396 days ago
My best is 980W - for 1 second
rootusrootus6 days ago
That's solid. If my memory is correct, and my teachers were correct (both of these are suspect) back in high school, a human should be able to momentarily exert about 1 horsepower at maximum effort. We did an experiment on how much power we could output at maximum effort. We tested it by sprinting up some number of flights of stairs, and timing it. As I recall we did conclude that in round numbers the hypothesis was correct.

But that was 35 years ago and it was a high school physics experiment meant to be entertaining more than precise.

iamacyborg6 days ago
And a good sprinter can make some toast!
eurekin6 days ago
I'm still sour they had only one toast in, in a two slot toaster
estebarb6 days ago
I can do high level thinking for around 6 hours with just two scrambled eggs and a cup of coffee.

What I need is something to prevent me from context drift. /starts googling how many scrambled eggs are equivalent to the energy consumed by a data center. Google how many chickens are in the world.../

Aachen6 days ago
Consider that you can do this as a working day because someone else is plowing the fields that grow your food, probably burning stored energy in fuels for the process

We're sadly not that efficient. The 150kcal/6h=600kcal/day you've mentioned aren't enough, and it takes more than 600kcal to create 600kcal plus transportation into your home

Besides, we won't stop existing, so any math about "chatgpt uses X kW and so it's better than hiring another human" doesn't work out. The human doesn't stop burning fuels when not in use: any LLM usage is additional energy that needs to be generated while staying within CO2 budgets

karussell6 days ago
> and it takes more than 600kcal to create 600kcal plus transportation into your home

This is not a strong argument or at least a different area of discussion. Because you can say exactly the same for the electricity: you need more than the power. You need the coal+transportation, or power plant, or solar panels ...

I'm pretty sure humans are much more energy efficient ... for certain tasks ;)

Aachen6 days ago
Sure, do the math for both, considering also that the human will continue to run anyway and then see who should do the task to minimise worldsuck :P
includenotfound5 days ago
I find AI helps a lot with my context drift (or attention deficit). I can now simply burst type questions one after another in a large prompt, then have the AI do all the relevant searches / data collections, and spit them out quickly, scratching many itches at once.

The problem is then that I get more questions, but AI can handle them faster than I can muster them up or type them. So it's a net win

pj_mukh6 days ago
"Tech companies have quietly abandoned their climate pledges to build gas-burning power plants that feed your favorite AI."

What I love is this quote is super-imposed with a background image that has gas-burning smokestacks but also nuclear cooling towers in the same field.

This is a bit representational of this particular line of protest against AI - just super confused about it all and thrashing out.

Green energy has been (technologically) solved, but instead we want to go back to manual labor as a source of power? Hilarious.

danbruc6 days ago
Not only nuclear power plants have cooling towers. Here [1] is, for example, a coal-fired one in Poland.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal-fired_power_station#/medi...

EDIT: To elaborate a bit, if you are burning oil or gas in a turbine, you do not need a cooling tower, the waste heat goes into the atmosphere with the exhaust. If you use fossil or nuclear fuels to produce steam for a steam turbine, you either need a river with enough flow to not boil all the fish if you reject the waste heat into it or you need a cooling tower to reject the heat into the atmosphere.

Foobar85686 days ago
We are in a state of the world where I don't know of it's a satire or a future actual product.
josefresco6 days ago
"Is this real?" launches a pretty realistic looking demo video. Hard to say these days though.
utopiah6 days ago
They raised $100M. /s
flawn6 days ago
They are part of the latest YC Batch. //s
john_strinlai6 days ago
instead of complaining about the website, which wouldn't be allowed, i am just going to link this much better reading experience instead: https://squeezlabs.github.io/handcrank/ (from the "technical documentation" link at the bottom of that... page thing)
theSuda6 days ago
I gave up on that page halfway through and just came here to read comments. Can't be bothered with this stuff anymore. Thanks for the link!
jszymborski6 days ago
As a bit of an aside, I really like the idea of trying to design things with the constraint of it having to be able to run off a hand-crank.

I feel like it is not only an interesting engineering challenge but one that might lead to a more efficient and sustainable framing.

bko6 days ago
Or we could... hear me out... build more power plants. The de-growth stuff is pretty evil when you take it to it's logical conclusion of population control.
xgulfie6 days ago
Do not confuse curiosity and caring for extremism.

If someone said they pick up trash on the side of the road to help the environment you wouldn't say the logical conclusion of their ideology would be that they become the unabomber

jszymborski6 days ago
There's a bit of a difference between population control and reaching a sustainable equilibrium. One can also argue the death of all life on earth is a pretty evil logical conclusion of infinite growth on a finite planet.
bko6 days ago
What does "sustainable equilibrium" mean?

What are you balancing if not human growth? And how do you plan to do that?

Terr_6 days ago
In a similar vein, the solar-powered website. [0]

[0] https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/about/the-solar-website/

hollerith6 days ago
It's not more sustainable though. It takes more energy to grow the food to get the calories to metabolize to turn the crank than it would to run an electric motor or a engine to do the same work.
jszymborski6 days ago
Totally true that what is and is not sustainable is more complicated than it first appears.

I think what I'm honing in on is the idea that hand cranks produce very limited, often interrupted power and are relative low-tech, both of which are directionally the right way for us to be putting our efforts.

nemo16186 days ago
I would love a crank-powered router. Would be a good way to curb internet addiction!
soylentcola6 days ago
Not sure it's possible to say this without being pithy, but haven't there been stories told, perhaps TV episodes and films made, regarding the concept of using human bodies to generate power in support of machine intelligence?

Seems a little on the nose to me, but I guess some days it's hard to tell what's a gag and what's a legit pitch.

soylentcola6 days ago
Yeeeap. Was thinking about that and the Matrix mostly.
jfyi6 days ago
Yeah, it all makes sense now.
JKolios6 days ago
Well, the Matrix did this. Badly. "Machines who have developed nuclear power are using human bodies as batteries"-level badly.
TremendousJudge6 days ago
From http://hpmor.com/chapter/64:

MORPHEUS: For the longest time, I wouldn't believe it. But then I saw the fields with my own eyes, watched them liquefy the dead so they could be fed intravenously to the living -

NEO (politely): Excuse me, please.

MORPHEUS: Yes, Neo?

NEO: I've kept quiet for as long as I could, but I feel a certain need to speak up at this point. The human body is the most inefficient source of energy you could possibly imagine. The efficiency of a power plant at converting thermal energy into electricity decreases as you run the turbines at lower temperatures. If you had any sort of food humans could eat, it would be more efficient to burn it in a furnace than feed it to humans. And now you're telling me that their food is the bodies of the dead, fed to the living? Haven't you ever heard of the laws of thermodynamics?

MORPHEUS: Where did you hear about the laws of thermodynamics, Neo?

NEO: Anyone who's made it past one science class in high school ought to know about the laws of thermodynamics!

MORPHEUS: Where did you go to high school, Neo?

(Pause.)

NEO: ...in the Matrix.

MORPHEUS: The machines tell elegant lies.

(Pause.)

NEO (in a small voice): Could I please have a real physics textbook?

MORPHEUS: There is no such thing, Neo. The universe doesn't run on math.

claysmithr6 days ago
Well, the original script said they used humans for their brainpower (computation)
rpastuszak6 days ago
Playdate (the came console) is amazing for this! I was really bored once and built a Claude Code remote control for Playdate.

Voice recognition was done via parrot + handy.computer Basically: different key combos were tied to different actions, e.g. \

    - hold A to speak
    - move the crank slowly to navigate
    - crank super fast to send the prompt
Eventually this became a universal remote control for the computers in my home (YAML file with bindings from Playdate UI → A11y events). Using the crank to control movies is fun!

(I can share the source -- just let me know if this is actually useful)

Also, I feel like the author and me have similar hobbies. A few years back I almost won a (re-sellable on Ebay) award for https://meat-gpt.sonnet.io !

(I lost to a gallery of 3d sandwiches)

Waterluvian6 days ago
I really wanted to like the Playdate but it's such an unbelievably overpriced and underspecced toy. But the crank, which really looked like a gimmick, is oddly quite nice to have and I wish my kids' Retro Arcade had one.
rpastuszak6 days ago
I mean it's 100-160 mHz CPU, 16 MB RAM, 4 GB storage -- you could run diablo 1 on it!
Waterluvian6 days ago
Yeah in retrospect I really got it wrong with “underspecced.” I really should have said “not colour.”

This all comes as a retrospective comparing it to my kids handheld for their MakeCode Arcade projects. The device that was 4x the price ended up on a shelf and I find myself borrowing theirs. I just wish it had that dumb crank. It’s so weird and yet I love it.

anana_6 days ago
I have one too and it never occurred to me to use it for anything other than games. Would be interested in seeing how you did it!
rpastuszak6 days ago
OK, I'll clean it up and post it in a few days
palmotea6 days ago
> We chose a cheap off-the-shelf switchable voltage 20W hand-crank generator marketed for emergency USB charging. The Pi normally draws around 1.5A, but when it’s working hard (as it does when doing inference on the CPU), its current requirements can increase substantially, causing the generator voltage to sag below the Pi’s required 4.8V or even, in the case of a momentary 5A spike, to trigger the generator’s internal overcurrent protection and shut off the voltage output entirely, causing the Pi to brown out.

> To ensure the Pi sees a steady voltage when the full inference stack kicks in (and to afford crankers a little rest), we built a custom capacitor board [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Zv_Hsinvx_sWtdur4iWY...] to smooth out the generator’s output and act as a short-term (~20 second) power reservoir.

Somewhat off-topic, but could this capacitor board work with a small-ish 5V USB solar panel? I'm not great with electronics, but it seems like just the solution for a device I want to run with the panel.

My vague impression was it's not kosher per the USB spec to just stick a capacitor across the supply to even out the brown-outs, but this looks like it's doing some other stuff.

piinbinary6 days ago
I bet if you took one of Taalas' cards which consumes 200 watts for 14,000 tokens/second [0] and slowed it down by a factor of 10, it would actually be quite reasonable to power by bicycle.

[0]: https://www.sdxcentral.com/news/chip-designer-taalas-bets-on...

Advertisement
ggamecrazy6 days ago
When I was at Peloton a long time ago, someone proposed an April Fools’ joke where we could announce a dynamo add-on that would let you power your house from your bike.

The math isn’t as bad as you might think: 200Wh (about a 60 min, somewhat intense ride) seems to be about 20 minutes for a H/B100. Still 3x, but not bad at all!

I remember the idea being dismissed quickly because people would likely actually want it.

hdndjsbbs6 days ago
200W is pretty good FTP for an "untrained" cyclist. FTP is the maximum you can sustain for a single hour, but you're not going to do multiple back-to-back.

Obviously the peloton crowd is biased towards people who will have better endurance and higher FTP, but basically the upshot is you could run one card for one hour with the effort of a 100km long ride which most recreational cyclists do once a week.

ptx6 days ago
> During voice agent startup, the slowest part are [...] in dlopen-ing large shared libraries (ONNX Runtime in particular) and in hundreds of small random reads off the SD card as Python walks the import graph.

Could this maybe be fixed by arranging the files on the filesystem in the order they're read? Or maybe importing the Python modules from a zip file (with no compression) would be faster, if that makes it easier to store them in the required order?

I seem to remember Windows having some sort of feature like that, automatically rearraging the data on disk in the order it's read when booting the system.

stymaar6 days ago
This is hilarious.

And also it mades me realize that we would all be way more healthy if we powered our laptops from bike power.

hmokiguess6 days ago
https://github.com/ktomanek/edge_voice_agent linked repo behind the concept
petruil25 days ago
Something that we miss from the puzzle of AI effort/energy consumption is what would be the amount of energy to build something or to find something in case that we had not the AI. we would need much more days to build a software, more people more energy. But with AI all these resources are reduced. We have to find the equilibrium among the entities..
joe_the_user6 days ago
I was hoping for a parody LLM that produced answers of increasing craziness until you stopped using it. Can someone point me to something like this?
square_usual6 days ago
You can make one yourself in ~100 lines of code.
SecretDreams6 days ago
I watched the "is this real" video and I'm still* not sure if it's real lol.

Regardless of this website presentation, the idea is sound and I'm behind it. We need to stop giving everything away to a hyper concentrated group of wealthy super elites that do not have our best interests at heart. We already have disappointing politicians that are elected. Now we also have disappointing unelected rich decision makers altering our lives based on what bar they had their next back of napkin scheme at.

yaroslavvb6 days ago
its real, I tried it a couple of weeks ago, asked some questions and got answers - https://x.com/yaroslavvb/status/2062692318415867983
SecretDreams6 days ago
They need to tackle two American problems at once and turn it into an exercise bike!
dole6 days ago
Addressed in the video, but now looks like we've got three problems.
jihadjihad6 days ago
Can you adjust the weights with a Shake Weight™?
claysmithr6 days ago
need the south park episode with the shake weight version of this
Chrise_N6 days ago
billing is $9.95 for each 60 second period, to accept, say "creme fraiche".
zb36 days ago
Well, I assume this isn't real, but.. I'd want to know the actual number - how much more (than in the demo) work'd we need to do (energy to produce) to actually power a CPU/GPU which could use real small on-device models..

I really want to know, no matter how big that number unfortunately is.

Waterluvian6 days ago
I prefer the gooblebox over the flooblecrank design. It keeps my hands free for other activities.
Advertisement
Standards12 days ago
I know the forced scrolling is annoying, but this concept is incredible
ecommerceguy6 days ago
I wasted many hours this weekend chatting with ai, so I did my business in excel using https://udm14.com/ to find relevant pages "old school". AI slops out fast.
xg156 days ago
The promo video is highly unrealistic.

No way there are still so many human devs in the office.

simonreiff6 days ago
This is so cool; I wonder what the roadmap includes? I'd love to see if this could evolve from gag product/gift idea, to a solar-powered inference box on slightly more robust hardware, for instance, completely freeing the owner from any need to purchase a subscription or rely upon the grid for inference. That would be freaking cool and I'm sure would sell a ton if the models that could run on the hardware were sufficiently capable and could be piped into a laptop (which seems like the easiest part). What would the power requirements be to run a more capable model than the ones used, maybe a DeepSeek open-source model? Really curious but I'm unfamiliar with the technical details that might go into such calculations.
sciencejerk6 days ago
I think it's a joke?
optimizedsphere5 days ago
Man, it'd be fun to hook this up to a sewing machine treadle table. (And, of course, paint the box with black lacquer and gold decals.)
pona-a6 days ago
I kept thinking this was a play on crank as in charlatan and crank as in hand-crank. Generate any flavor of crankery with the turn of a crank. Turns out it wasn't satire...
misiek086 days ago
ACTUALLY xD Transferring power from gym bicycles is one of the smartest things. But they probably won’t even be enough for the AC to run - still a lot of power and heat lost.
drusepth6 days ago
This makes me yearn for the golden years of april fools online.
darkvertex6 days ago
And here I thought this was gonna be a Playdate GPT client app.
notahacker6 days ago
They're not raising at $1bn valuation until they pull out a slide deck with hockey stick curves showing the point that human brawn can out-think human brain...
Advertisement
t1234s6 days ago
By the title I was hoping for an off-the-rails LLM on Crank.
a965 days ago
I thought someone trained a model on conspiracy theories.
t1234s5 days ago
somebody please do this!
capricornpl6 days ago
So many questions... Does it support /effort setting? What about subagents and multi agent setups? What's the max token output on a diesel generator?
not_the_fda5 days ago
We have a gym at work. We can have half the team generate tokens and half the team use the tokens.

Put up a leader board in the gym on tokens generated.

harrouet6 days ago
Always amazed by the mount of time, effort and skill that goes into this kind of prank :).

(although I salute the attention it brings to an important cause)

lostmsu6 days ago
I love this idea but for gamers who need an incentive to workout. You can only game on power you generated with your own muscles.
lukasbm6 days ago
15 Million Merits
cliffasaurus6 days ago
Finally an eco-friendly AI? Where the only water consumed is the glasses you drink because you got tired of cranking?
cjs_ac6 days ago
I thought this was going to be about LLM-generated conspiracy theories, but the website was funny anyway.

There's a technical documentation link at the bottom of the page that documents an actual working hand-crank-powered Raspberry Pi that runs a local model.

glaslong6 days ago
Oh that's a fun idea... I've been poking at a "ghost phone" that synthesizes a personality and matching voice, which rings at random times on an old candlestick rotodial handset.

"Conspiracy call-in" on a CB radio would be a good variation!

asdf4205 days ago
Ready for the gooble box version
pickleballcourt6 days ago
I always kind of wondered if you were out on an island would this help with survival
Advertisement
wett6 days ago
nit: “Is this real” dialog took a bit to load on mobile, a placeholder would be nice
PhillyPhuture6 days ago
Missed opportunity to have Laurence Fishburne somewhere in the advertising.
isuckatcoding6 days ago
Could one apply the same principle to a solar powered machine I wonder
johnnytech6 days ago
For the real hardware, what do you use as the AI computer? a Pi 5?
Sharlin6 days ago
I'm pretty sure I've seen this in Black Mirror.
bogometer6 days ago
I will wait for the legion of hamster wheels power upgrade...
Johnny_Bonk6 days ago
It's things like this that give me hope for humanity.
myworkaccount26 days ago
I can't tell if this is a joke, or they are serious.
avodonosov6 days ago
Enterprises will use mostly horses I think, not gyms
reactordev6 days ago
I feel like Orange Theory has a new business prop...
Advertisement
panarchy6 days ago
Looking forward to cranking one out.
smileybarry6 days ago
Whether it's a parody or satire or a fake product page for a DIY project, emphasizing the climate cost of AI while using AI to generate every video there kind of ruins it.
Joe_Cool6 days ago
I still prefer my Magic 8 Ball, it's less exhausting. But this is pretty cool.
engineer_226 days ago
TBH I'd buy that.
utopiah6 days ago
Seems people do already, for your next small gift exchange or if you birthday look up "USB Hand Crank Phone Charger" it's like $20.

Edit: I confess, kind of tempted, 41 EUR for a "big" one https://www.bol.com/be/fr/p/zimoros-handslingergenerator-kra...

engineer_224 days ago
Lol did you reverse image search the prototype? Lmao
utopiah3 days ago
Nope, I literally did as I said namely look up "USB Hand Crank Phone Charger".
ivannz6 days ago
the versificator machine form Orwell’s 1984.
mikaeluman6 days ago
I tried visiting the site but the design was incredibly annoying.

I take it this was some kind of joke.

movedx016 days ago
nice, cranker
rwoerz6 days ago
Now I have that image in mind, where some Morlock finds that thing 100000 years after we have blown up our civilization and can actually make use of it.
sergiotapia6 days ago
I ain't reading allat. Fix your website bro!
boombapoom6 days ago
I'm a bit disappointed you don't have to insert physical tokens to operate the handle
Advertisement
bozdemir6 days ago
Slavery with extra steps? Are we trying to power some douche-bag scientist's car battery?
bozdemir6 days ago
I guess ppl who down voted didnt get the Rick and Morty reference.
singpolyma36 days ago
... it's just a blank page?
teeray6 days ago
Now we know why everyone was generating power on bikes in “Fifteen Million Merits”
adam1234566 days ago
hi
chaidhat6 days ago
In the future, humans will just all be on hamster wheels generating power for our AI overlords.
nobrains6 days ago
The Matrix