ZH version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
50% Positive
Analyzed from 634 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#still#https#nocebo#effect#believe#curses#wikipedia#traiteur#essential#don
Discussion (19 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
Lately I have been stirring the cauldron and getting to know quite a few witchy women and there are a lot of them who make and sell their own essential oil products that are like the MLM products but don't have the upline and all it entails. Still I think "just get a diffuser".
(Some people would disagree: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48734824)
For all the little bit of positive results for a placebo there are also negative effects due to noceboeffect.
Also it's very common in esoterica that if it works it was the healer if it didn't it was something you did wrong.
People in traditional cultures are inclined to believe that there is an evil influence involved whenever anything goes wrong. If you're in a culture like that and people believe you can throw curses, you can get material benefit through the threat of throwing curses or make a living throwing curses.
When people were [1] prosecuted for "practicing witchcraft" courts record testimony that promises were made, payments were made, all of that.
Effective curses are not an application of psi (you zapped someone with telepathy) or an evocation of evil spirits, but are loud, noisy, public and supported by the whole social environment, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voodoo_death
I can't say that any magic-user today should practice that sort of stuff, there is the "it gets returned you (3|10) times" bit and that you don't have the social support that the African "witch doctor", Chinese fox medium, Navajo skin-walker, or Italian Nonna who casts the "evil eye". But if you're looking for a social-scientific explanation of how magic works it is a dramatic example.
[1] and still are in some places
I'm not sure how it applies here though because alternative therapies rarely state expected negative effects.
Sometimes called non-cebo/none-cebo though I avoid that as starting with “nonce” can be a trigger for the easily befuddled and offended (“Could you be experiencing a noncebo type effect?”, “WHAT DID YOU CALL ME?!”).
As the wikipedia page points out, this is not to be confused with knowcebo, which sounds the same. This is where information leaks break blinding measures and render test results less (or completely not) meaningful.
No.
> Did Mme Abgrall cure the warts?
No, that was your daughter’s immune system.
Genuinely. It's like magic.
He took the morphine.
On another note, I had respect for Aeon as a publication, and now I got a lot less.