Human Emacs

bbirdculture about 6 hours ago 3 commentsRead Article on human-emacs.org

ZH version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 111 words in the discussion.

Discussion (3 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

mimischi•about 6 hours ago

And yet, the Emacs community appears more vibrant than ever with many AI-assisted/-related projects (ghostty.el and agent-shell.el, among others) thriving and bringing a fresh wind into the ecosystem!

legobmw99•about 5 hours ago

I think it is reasonable to have a higher (or at least, different) standard for Emacs core than for packages.

I also feel compelled to say that I personally think a lot of what has brought more energy into Emacs world recently is treesit and eglot becoming widely available in distributions, neither of which involved any AI

d0mine•about 5 hours ago

These are orthogonal:

- there are people who do not want LLM contributions being accepted into emacs itself (legal, maintainers burnout, etc reasons)

- there are projects (such as gptel, pi-coding-agent) that enable LLM usage from within emacs

Both may be true at the same time.