Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 293 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#lua#zig#written#platform#used#idea#art#docs#don#software

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

nusaruabout 3 hours ago
I like the idea for this project, but not a huge fan of the AI-written docs.
Tiberiumabout 2 hours ago
I don't think it's just the docs that are LLM written.
TheGoddessInariabout 1 hour ago
I try not to be negative, but this software seems bizarre. It's a Lua meta manager written in Zig, that calls itself cross platform (Linux / MacOS only), and depends on external gnu build tools, not even the native Zig portable retargeting llvm.

LLMs are usually too busy agreeing to push back on the ideas & details like this.

lioeters4 minutes ago
It's a shame because it's a pretty website and the idea sounds good. I looked around in the codebase but I don't see a Lua runtime written in Zig, just a wrapper that manages dependencies (?), I guess similar to LuaRocks. It seems the difference is that the package manager is a Lua module imported and used in a user build script instead of as a CLI.

The word salad in the documentation gives me the same impression that crypto projects used to give, with various poetic/technical terms that vaguely seem plausible but never converge to a tight coherent picture.

Probably we're going to be seeing many more projects like these, a weird kind of modern art that gives a hint of an idea but leaves you confused. And like gallery owners and dealers, there would be people exchanging large sums of capital for such vague "art" whose purpose is to function as a commodity, an empty representation without meaning or value, a signifier that points nowhere.

extrordinaire10 minutes ago
More than one platform, different arch/ABI qualify as cross-platform, it is not stated as omni-platform... Zig CC (LLVM backed) is widely used across for materializing first-class C modules. It aims to leverage the Lua ecosystem then it is expected to rely on GNU tools for building legacy, already upstream and stablished LuaRocks packages, i.e. makefiles, or GCC dependent recipes. That is a pragmatic compatibility choice to use the existing Lua ecosystem out-of-the-box, while it is encouraged the use of moonstone native hermetic recipes (which rely on zig cc).
jackhalfordabout 1 hour ago
What is the current state of the art lua toolchain? Lua is king for dsl embedded in other software.

Used it for world of warcraft scripting and openresty http rules, that’s a wide range.