Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

87% Positive

Analyzed from 884 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#radicle#https#network#bitchat#bluetooth#dev#com#app#project#mesh

Discussion (47 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

thisisnotauserabout 1 hour ago
I love these posts, every week it's "Gloop is now on Ploof!"
TaupeRanger42 minutes ago
And at least one comment references "Curtains for Zoosha"
fooker16 minutes ago
It's a basic step to make a plumbis
momentmaker9 minutes ago
For some context, it seems like the Indian government wants Bitchat to be taken down.

https://xcancel.com/jack/status/2080565084586135773

illithid06 minutes ago
Surely this won't have the opposite effect that they're looking for.
nfbdhdfbf1 minute ago
It definitely won’t.

People love pointing out the Streisand effect though we’re still in the same social media dynamic that we were 30 or 15 years ago.

Banning the app is 100% certainly going to reduce it usage and the fact that you somehow think you could have the opposite effect is delusional

Cider9986about 1 hour ago
People interested in BitChat should download it just so you have it in case it gets popular or you find someone to use it with. I tested it and it's surreal to text without WiFi or cellular.
allthetime34 minutes ago
Bluetooth chat apps already exist. I used a really shitty looking (but functional) one called Berkanan that I found by searching the App Store for a Bluetooth chat app to talk to friends on ryan air flights where we weren’t sitting together across Europe last year.
gritzko11 minutes ago
I think FireChat was the first one, in 2011.
plebian40 minutes ago
If they care so much about availability maybe they should reconsider including libs.gms.location and be available on F-Droid (https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/merge_requests/24907#...)
zenethianabout 3 hours ago
Is this bit-chat or bitch-at?
subscribedabout 3 hours ago
Yes :)
logicchainsabout 1 hour ago
Find out on expertsexchange.com
all2about 1 hour ago
Have you ever heard of the rather excellent Pen Island, vendors of fine pens? On my work computer, so you can plumb the internet archive for yourself.
xyst21 minutes ago
BitchX was already taken
embedding-shapeabout 2 hours ago
Sounds like a suitable addition to the ATProto ecosystem :)
culiabout 2 hours ago
It's explicitly in opposition to ATProto. That's probably why they went with Radicle and not Tangled
VulgarExigency29 minutes ago
What the hell are Radicle and Tangled
dmboydabout 2 hours ago
Or a misspelling of bitch hat
HumblyTossedabout 1 hour ago
Yep.
tamimioabout 3 hours ago
It depends on whom you’re talking to
baron3dlabout 1 hour ago
Bitchat is an AOS (https://andotherstuff.org/#foundry-projects) project. Surprised, they didn't rehost it on ngit (https://gitworkshop.dev/), which is also an AOS project.
qwertyastronaut35 minutes ago
I can’t wait until Goblin is acquired by Nematode. Then finally they might make Gorbachev open source.
ronsor30 minutes ago
And I thought Poob already had it for you.

Too many proper nouns in titles.

xyzsparetimexyzabout 1 hour ago
Yo where's my
dmixabout 2 hours ago
That Radicle site design is an interesting take for a git repo platform. Good use of full width spacing, well thought out navigation, nice code rendering. I dig it.
pioneerjeffabout 3 hours ago
Are there any special features comparing with other decentrilized message product? Such as Nostr or XMTP?
ckchengabout 3 hours ago
Works over Bluetooth mesh offline and Nostr online.

Relevant discussion yesterday:

> “Government orders GitHub to remove Bluetooth-based chat app Bitchat: Jack Dorsey”

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49036433

KennyBlanken37 minutes ago
What a bunch of clickbaity nonsense.

Indian government*. They shut off internet access and order people to remove stuff all the time. Nobody pays any attention to them.

It's still up on Github. https://github.com/permissionlesstech/bitchat

subscribedabout 3 hours ago
Yes, it's in the first paragraph of https://bitchat.free/.
xyst22 minutes ago
In theory, this could work.

Setup machine with bluetooth receiver.

Funnel packets from Bluetooth receiver over a virtual private network (ie, wireguard, tailscale, netbird).

Then in another state/country/continent with server connected to vpn then rebroadcasts those packets over BLE.

A mesh network overlayed on top of another mesh network.

Advertisement
imtringuedabout 2 hours ago
I hope they will enjoy fighting with https://radicle.dev/ over the project name.
cosmojgabout 2 hours ago
I'm pretty sure that's the same project.
chanuxabout 2 hours ago
I assumed they are the same :-O
lostmsuabout 2 hours ago
One seems to be built on top of the other? Very confusing though, I agree.
varun_chabout 1 hour ago
I found https://radicle.dev/2026/04/23/domain-move

It sounds like both are the same project, one is the “explorer” which is on a different domain so that censoring it doesn’t impact the main site

IshKebababout 1 hour ago
I think radicle.dev is the software that lets you store issues and PRs inside a Git repo, and radicle.network is some kind of interface to people's hosts that run the Radicle software. Something like that?

I agree it's super confusing though and their explanation isn't exactly clear:

https://radicle.network/principles

behindsight37 minutes ago
the main reason they mentioned [1] for radicle.network is because their old domain radicle.xyz was blocked in some places by some lists that they think was because it may have hosted certain UGC that triggered some flags.

> Content about Radicle (explainers, guides, download links, blog posts) which is under control of the Radicle team. We will use radicle.dev for these purposes.

> Content on Radicle (repositories hosted on practically any node on the network) which the Radicle team has only very little control over, accessible via Radicle Explorer. Going forward, our deployment of Radicle Explorer will not be hosted on app.radicle.xyz anymore, but instead it will be hosted at radicle.network.

> The idea is of course that if there are complaints about or issues with radicle.network in the future, we hope that radicle.dev stays largely unaffected and people can continue to inform themselves about Radicle and learn how to set it up.

On a semi-related note, this is a good time to remind anyone that hasn't yet heard of the Public Suffix List (PSL) [2][3] to make sure you put your domains that may be hosting UGC in the form <usercontent>.<yourdomain>.<tld> (ie: eTLDs) on that list so browsers and other block lists are aware that the user provisioned subdomains are UGC and not from your site so it properly isolates cookies/site grouping and won't flag your entire domain as malicious.

1: https://radicle.dev/2026/04/23/domain-move

2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Suffix_List

3: https://github.com/publicsuffix/list

ck2about 2 hours ago
btw what's the current state of mesh wifi?

seems like after November or January 2029 might need it since administration now has a kill-switch so why wouldn't they use it

VCFundedGenYerabout 2 hours ago
Such a terrible name. Can't believe marketing didn't catch it.
culiabout 2 hours ago
Probably on purpose. Like "Broken, But Whole"
logicchainsabout 1 hour ago
It could be deliberate. Like Wechat's Chinese name is "Weixin", which is a pun on "for sex" in Mandarin (for which its "people nearby" feature originally saw heavy usage). As a decentralized social network, Bitchat might see similar usage.
orliesaurusabout 3 hours ago
Is this irc compatible?
embedding-shapeabout 2 hours ago
Everything is pointing towards a hard "no", but I didn't dig deeper than literally read the first sentence in the README:

> A decentralized peer-to-peer messaging app with dual transport architecture: local Bluetooth mesh networks for offline communication and internet-based Nostr protocol for global reach. No accounts, no phone numbers, no central servers. It's the side-groupchat.

culiabout 2 hours ago
How would it be? Bitchat is for offline communication over Bluetooth Low Energy networks