Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 139 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#grapheneos#features#rule#law#hadn#given#authorities#duress#pin#presumably

Discussion (4 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

pogueabout 2 hours ago
If he hadn't given the authorities the duress pin, and presumably they had seized it, would the encryption/protection GrapheneOS provides have been enough to keep them from accessing it's contents? I've never used Graphene so I'm unfamiliar with all it's features.

My Samsung phone has a feature to automatically format the device if the wrong code is entered X number of times, and I have security software that would let me wipe it remotely (if it still had internet access) so this whole situation brings up a lot of questions about features like this.

EDIT More discussion about it here, but it's quite technical. I was a bit confused about the rate limiting stuff and etc.

GrapheneOS protections against data extraction from locked devices - HN Post https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49055169

inigyou12 minutes ago
Just like when India banned Bitchat, this proves GrapheneOS works and you should use it.
GuestFAUniverse41 minutes ago
Doesn't make sense to me to undermine the right to refuse information. From my POV dictatorships try to do that, not a rule of law.
inigyou16 minutes ago
The country in question is a dictatorship without rule of law