Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

89% Positive

Analyzed from 465 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#open#mojo#source#rust#qualcomm#https#sourcing#traction#here#lot

Discussion (17 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

aeonfluxabout 2 hours ago
Does this project have any meaningful traction? Seemed like a cool idea, but I wasn't even sure what problem does it solves. Looks like its completely missing from the regular discussion / news outlets. Every 1-2 years some barely visible post/article reminds me it even exists...
mihaelmabout 1 hour ago
I think the compiler not being open-source hurt with getting people to check it out. Today, people are accustomed to most of it regarding PL development being out in the open, and Mojo was an outlier here.
jdnierabout 1 hour ago
You can read a lot more about it here: https://mojolang.org/docs/vision/
fluidcruft32 minutes ago
I'm pretty excited about mojo and look forward to it continuing into the phase of supporting systems programming. I have been using rust a lot lately for things I had used python for (that were not computation). I really like rust for static typing and functional programming patterns... but not for numerics. Hopefully mojo can become a serious staticly typed alternative to python.

When mojo 1.0 was announced, I looked into porting my current rust project (a very opinionated type-driven DICOM library/anonymizer that has a spec implemented in haskell) and it wasn't ready for that sort of work yet vs continuing with rust. Which is fine! The numerics side looks great. I'm glad they have reached 1.0 and open sourced.

tecleandorabout 1 hour ago
Maybe I'm a party pooper, but given Qualcomm history, open sourcing just after acquisition feels like they don't care about it and they're going to let it die while they cut Modular in pieces and extract all the juice possible of their cloud offering.
fluidcruft31 minutes ago
Open sourcing was on Mojo's roadmap long before Qualcomm was in the picture.
flaburganabout 3 hours ago
Summarized here: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Modular-Mojo-Open-Source

This is by Chris Lattner, known for LLVM and Swift.

wewewedxfgdf29 minutes ago
Qualcomm is a notoriously closed source company.

Don't reward them with your support just because they are forced to open source something.

cromka18 minutes ago
Notoriously is a stretch if almost all of Linux ARM commits these days come from them
rvz21 minutes ago
They are no better than Nvidia.

I do not see your point.

knlbabout 1 hour ago
I had been holding off on testing out mojo till it was open sourced, and started picking it up this week.

So far I've been enjoying the language (pythonic, comptime, tile support) and plan to spend time using it to work with gpus to learn more, the puzzles are also pretty cool.

chanuxabout 1 hour ago
This is how I imagined you seeing Qualcomm :D

https://youtu.be/eFbtGDGbdFU?si=VJ0XSiuNO9Z36DtD&t=30

woadwarrior0126 minutes ago
Really happy to see this. Kudos to Qualcomm for releasing it under a liberal Apache 2.0 license.

Strategically speaking, I think this only makes sense as an anti-NVIDIA play.

acheong08about 1 hour ago
This is nice, but the long time it took them to open source I think burnt a lot of the initial traction. I do like the idea & I'll see whether I can make use of it
mihaelmabout 1 hour ago
The actual blog post on open-sourcing: https://www.modular.com/blog/mojo-open-source

I remember being really interested a few years ago when it was billed as a superset of Python. I know they pivoted away from that, but I might play with it now that the compiler is also open source.

flikabout 1 hour ago
Exciting. For hobby projects, I was looking into what should be my programming language. Open source was a criteria. Now I have choice between Rust and Mojo.
Heidaradarabout 1 hour ago
They made a big mistake by not open sourcing before, doubt they'll ever gain traction now.
Advertisement