Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 144 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#cyber#harness#experimenting#code#claude#job#fable#opus#trained#since

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

joker99about 3 hours ago
Since the “magic“ is in the harness: can anyone recommend a good OSS cyber harness?

I’ve been experimenting a bunch at $work and for large heterogeneous code bases, just using codex or claude seems to work better than experimenting with tools like code graph/graphql to save on tokens

k4roshiabout 3 hours ago
How was this so urgent that it required sleepless nights for the team?!
LoganDarkabout 3 hours ago
It just means they really love their job :)
exceptioneabout 3 hours ago
I don't see Fable, but I guess Fable would refuse to work anyway on cyber problems(?) But why would Opus 5 work then?
LoganDarkabout 3 hours ago
The Cyber Verification Program only applies to Opus and Sonnet: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cy...
LoganDarkabout 3 hours ago
Of course, the model trained most recently does the best job. Do we know what DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's knowledge cutoff is? For all we know, it's simply working in parallel with how the vulnerabilities were first discovered, even if the solutions themselves weren't trained in.

Surprised to see Grok 4.6 performing so well. Shame I can't use it privately -- I would never risk getting my Twitter account banned for that