US Government Designates Host of Noblogs.org a "Global Terrorist"

"I am a freedom fighter, you are a rebel, and he is a terrorist."

Going against the US regime means you're a terrorist. If you instead bomb a "terrorist nation", i.e. "a nation not aligned with the US regime"'s schoolgirls, you're a freedom fighter.

Terrorism has always meant the other guy's goons, as opposed to my freedom fighters.

> one has long wondered what this government actually considers NOT to be terrorism

Anyone willing to line their pockets, it seems.

>This doesn't exactly make one want to spend their next vacation in the USA – even though, admittedly, we have our own problems here.

Don't worry, Trump and Musk will export their model to Europe. They guys and gals who were easily bought by Russia when it had money will very gladly side with the richest and gaudiest men on Earth.

The American Right are spending a surprising amount of resources on fucking over Europe. Once piece of good news about a future US economic crash is that there'd be no money left to do that. After Elon gets a tax bill from a new progressive administration whose answer to "You can't tax your way out of America's problems" is either "Well lets at least try" or even "If the effect is just to get rid of the billionaires we're OK with that too" your local racists may find he's too distracted to wire them some more cash for their antics.

But maybe that's just wishful thinking, it's not as though there weren't fascists about, they just didn't have the same funding before.

> They could just call them a criminal organization seeking directly, or indirectly, to contribute to violence for political ends

Most jurisdictions will prosecute you under terrorism laws for that.

The "adjectives" (far-left) are there just explain to the public what kind of terrorism they are talking about.

> because it sounds like weak credibility in search of social support

And it works!

But if they label it far left then they get to rile their idiot supporters up.

Nonsense and delusion and lies.

The right is far more angry and violent. https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities... https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/right-wing-extremist-v...

And not over any good cause either, just violence for violence sake, no principles, no stakes.

These people arrested trying to assassinate 47? Either right or neutral. The presidents own people.

The right as always is desperately relying on projection. Their media systems blare that the cities are unlivable hell, that social order is breaking down, that antifa is burning cities down. The pitiful lies to deluded base, low engagement that they are, happy to be baited, laps it up. The right are insurrectionist psychos, are anti-social maniacs deluded and violent.

No. Just because I am not against people golfing, does not making me a golfer.

Assuming this is a serious question: There are people who are not themselves fascists who object to the direct action tactics (read: violence, vandalism) sometimes employed under the banner of "antifa."

Yes. Or pro-fa.

Why downvoted? It IS a fascist regime you have there in your 1st world shitshow. Get over it and name it as it is.

No, it is pro free speech. It is only when you censor or insult or criticize far right that free speech gets in danger.

According to that, they provided services to the guys that cut off parts of Berlin from the power grid, that caused 1 fatality.

IANAL but the common understanding of the situation would be: You can't as an ISP prevent malicious actors from using your service, but you do can assist the government - in this case the German - to hand over the data to help assist law enforcement. If state-department's claims are true, did noblogs.org do so?

“They are either the hero or the victim, but never the perpetrator.” - Narcissist ethos

“Narcissism has more in common with self-hatred than with self-admiration.” - Christopher Lasch

“The four core pillars of narcissism, as defined by clinical psychologist Dr. Ramani Durvasula, are a lack of empathy, grandiosity, a chronic sense of entitlement, and a constant need for admiration and validation” - America Psychology Association (possibly a global terrorist organization)

More related than dupe, as this article includes a statement from the group being labeled terrorist.

For voters to actually be in control, they would have to do straightforward things like reject the obviously terrible destructionist candidate in favor of the milquetoast corpo stooge. I would love to say it's as principled as "I chose the wrench" from Good Will Hunting. But from everything I've surmised it's that mass media propaganda is really strong - most people simply can't fit more than one thing in their head at once. Focus them on how bad A is and they will eagerly choose B all day long despite it being clearly worse.

A long time ago I had the realization that the primary information flow in democracy isn't the few bits from each citizen to the government, but rather it's from the candidates/parties to the people making them think they wanted any of the ensuing shit because they "chose" it. And I'd say Grumpism has thoroughly proven that out. The people who used to be your average conservatives are now radical reactionary destructionists, and if you nudge them to ponder their former values they wince at thinking too hard and then get angry at you.