ZH version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
54% Positive
Analyzed from 2504 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#urinal#splash#urinals#someone#https#user#floor#design#public#toilets
Discussion (91 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
https://improbable.com/ig/winners/#ig2026
Edit: The splash free urinal was the winner for physics!
I once joked that these do more for science than Nobel prizes. Now I don't think it's a joke: "wacky but interesting" awards are more important for the advancement of science than "everyone agrees this these people should be even more famous" awards.
Looking back I feel sad - that's the kind of curiosity to nurture in a kid. But peers are rarely the best group, it would've been better to tell my parents or the right kind of teacher. My friends also could've said something: " I don't know what to do about this but you should tell ms blah blah blah", in a serious way not mocking way.
I'm glad someone else has finally looked at this sticky situation
> I'm glad someone else has finally looked at this sticky situation
Wait ... your splash variants are sticky???
You can pee on one of these mats and the stream almost aerates itself on impact and you get basically no splashback, I guess with a similar mechanism to how an aerating tap produces a stream of water that doesn’t splash off whatever it hits.
[0] not a nobel prize but the prize of the swedish bank in memory of ...
I did encounter an upside-down one yesterday. That was... counterproductive.
Makes me wonder why. Was that a misprint? Did someone get confused about the correct direction for the fingers?
If 50% of the population walk out of a public bathroom without tracking urine on their feet or anything else that touched the floor and custodians have 99% less bodily fluids to deal with, that seems like positive progress. Maybe it will move the needle in ways that are unexpected.
Talk to a local mechanical engineer who does plumbing design for recommendations that are available in your market and their probable cost.
If you are getting noticeable splashback, you have a very poorly designed urinal. The kind that gets architects angry calls from clients.
——
I used to work in architecture.
The way I would see this happening is if users insist on it. And we likely won't until we experience one of these in real life, which makes it a chicken and egg problem.
There's also the argument that splash mats are a cheaper and even superior approach. That argument is unconvincing to me, because the ones I have experienced have been mostly ineffective, but it sounds like others' experience has been better. Maybe here in the US we just don't have very good ones? As a country, we've always been pretty bad at anything that seems gross. (Not that it's all that different in the rest of the West.) We have this naive faith in the ability of dry toilet paper to clean that which it can not, and disgust at alternative approaches that actually work. But that's a different topic. (Specifically, solids not liquids!)
This paper is Ig® Nobel Physics Prize Winner 2026 https://improbable.com/ig/winners/
There is more to it than the splashback tho. Sometimes it seems that the surfaces that already have splashes on them are not angled properly to lead the water to the drain. This seems to create need to have sharp edge/lip rather than round one, which might be tricky to make resilient in porcelain. But the rounded lip certainly allows for droplet flow towards the user rather than the drain hole.
Frankly, this is more important to me. I’m not looking around, and if someone else does, that’s their problem.
What they need to do with urinal design is to make one that can catch the wide-spray of someone who sports a PA.
I worked as a temp once in a stae government building. It didn't have enough bathrooms. The toilets were of the type that drained/fastened to the wall instead of the floor. One day, someone big sat down and broke it. There was an angry announcement on the rarely-used building-wide speaker. Nobody owned-up to it.
What we really need is laminar flow!
> Instead of minimising splash, it can instead be maximized by setting […], see Fig. 7a. Although not suitable as a commonly practical urinal, it showcases the design philosophy. Such a surface could be installed outdoors to deter public urination as the offender would fall prey to enhanced splash-back. This hostile surface may be dubbed as “urine-no,” as shown in Fig. 7b.
Love it!
I suppose this disproves Tufte's "There are only two industries that call their customers 'users': illegal drugs and software."
I remember being unpleasantly surprised by one after a particularly heavy New Year's as a student.
https://academic.oup.com/view-large/figure/512223725/pgaf087...
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fountain_(Duchamp)
[1]: https://www.hlwashrooms.co.uk/healey--lord-niagara-urinals--...
[2]: https://acornthorn.co.uk/urinals-wcs-cubicles/urinals/ur068-...
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/2026-ig-nobels-9.733140...
An anatomically inferior sitting toilet in similar settings will often be soiled by careless users. However, a conscientious user can tidy their contact surfaces with toilet paper.
This has been my observation from my travels in the three continents I have been able to observe squat toilets in use.
I don't understand, because in a squat toilet, there is no contact surface!
They had some fun writing this.
* there's not always a properly functioning seat / seat at all
* the seat is not always dry
* the cubicles do not always have a functioning lock
* the bowl is not always 'clear'...for reasons probably best left unexplored, people seem to choose public toilets as a place to carry out the most incomprehensible and unimaginable of all bowel movements. I've been greeted with bowls that let's just say would be benefit being assessed by a trained professional
Public toilets are also often pretty grim places in general due to the smells, sounds and general lack of hygiene/cleanliness.
All that said...IF the toilets look in decent repair I personally will use the cubicle and sit down, but it's probably less than 30% of toilets that feel like that's an option.
Also just to say I am someone who always sits to pee whenever at home/in a person's home and i'm not someone who anyone would ever call a germaphobe, so I do generally choose to sit rather than stand.
b) sitting on a seat you just wiped piss off
c) piss on the floor which will get on your trousers if you sit
I was just in a stall where the inside of door had a pictogram forbidding users from standing on the edge of the bowl and squatting. I assume this might be for visitors from countries where squatting is common.
Point being, you just never know what random members of the public will do with a door to hide behind.
[1] : https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/dispatch/images/c/ca/Dispa...
One of the more interesting scientific studies was the behavioural change of when you put down the image of a fly on an urinal. These flies are suddenly targeted by strong streams as if there is no tomorrow ...
What resource will we run out of if we continue to piss in traditional urinals?
Has bullshit marketing terms invaded scientific papers now as well?
It's surprising it's that high (8%). I would imagine it takes as long to mop a floor that has pee droplets or mop a floor that doesn’t. And someone still needs to mop the bathroom floor anyway and go into the bathroom anyway. Unless you pay the cleaners by hour instead of having them on payroll, monetarily I don't see the difference.
I expect cleaning costs to be dominated by the long tail, ie every bathroom cleanup job being the same except for the odd time when someone threw up on the floor or sprayed poop on the walls or what have you.
Still nice to not get pee on yourself though, that part is good.
You might have to mop more often from complaints or inspection, maybe?
https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/4/4/pgaf087/80987...