ZH version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
86% Positive
Analyzed from 380 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#both#trump#checks#via#dividend#public#why#vote#etc#sides

Discussion (20 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
But turns out it's a fun game for another branch of government too.
This is in large part why Romney lost in 2012 and why no fiscally conservative candidate could beat Trump in the 2016 Republican primary. The average Joe doesn’t want to vote for the “eat your vegetables” candidate.
I hate it but Trump is smart enough to realize that you have to pander like this or you’ll lose. Democrats have historically been the party of “vote for me for more free stuff,” and he’s trying to beat them at their own game.
The end result of these vote buying schemes from both parties will be either a sovereign debt crisis or massive inflation. Maybe both.
Catherine Rampell / The Bulwark via Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/crampell.bsky.social/post/3mv4z7az4...
lol
It's like saying that a murderer and a jaywalker are both criminals, so they're basically the same.
What is your intent, beyond cynicism?
I really wish Libertarians would actually win.