ZH version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⚡ Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
89% Positive
Analyzed from 886 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#dance#https#more#learning#something#com#moves#own#music#things

Discussion (24 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
My favorite example of this is at somewhere like a rave or Phish show etc where you can see people form their own little conversations and groups and move on as the night goes.
And of course you have people just enjoying having a nice talk with themselves and the music.
In more professional settings you see people try to fit dance into little boxes and say what it is or is not... it predates spoken language. It is something very primal, not even uniquely human.
Everything is so artificial online today as well, that maybe it's the contrast between what we see all day vs when we're at events, that make it all seem extra special nowadays.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ltoAcZrjBw
(Faithless : 'God Is A DJ', Live at Alexandra Palace)
I feel like a lot of the "AI-doomerism" could be solved if people go out where large groups listen to music, and dance together with strangers. I even wrote about one recent experience in more detail some weeks ago: https://emsh.cat/en/the-people-are-still-there/
Of maypole dance and the algebra of braids
An example video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCpXbHpy9LY
How is this possibly your take away from someone describing how they see something? You know nothing about this person, yet conclude they have a bleak perspective, yet you're the one who is criticizing someone for merely thinking and talking about an activity.
Let people enjoy activities in the way they want. If they want to endlessly analyze and discuss the mechanical details about it, or if they just want to stand on the top of a roof in the rain and dance, who cares? They're both "enjoying" the activity, just in different ways.
However I could not figure out which partner dances he focuses on, I would be curious to know.
Note: the author is also on HN. He made this:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49649789
What???
Ppl definitely learn by various means.
Im reading it wrong or what?
The way I read some of the literature is that these may more often map to preferences, so the individual may prefer to see things, when learning, but it might not actually lead to more learning happening.
In dance I would yield that some people can repeat a movement just by seeing it, and others can't, but again I would say that's a learning style, I'd say there's a capacity inside them that is less strong/developed, translating movement seen to movement done. And it can be improved.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_styles#Criticism
https://onlineteaching.umich.edu/articles/the-myth-of-learni...