Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

50% Positive

Analyzed from 135 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#signal#number#bootstrap#phone#mission#public#bots#usable#security#worked

Discussion (5 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

chewsabout 2 hours ago
I have worked with Trail of Bits before and their cryptography teams are of the toppest of notches, I still have deep skepticism of Signal though. There are safer ways to use it, never getting push notifications is one part of it. I think their work is admirable, but the need for them to bootstrap you with SMS is a gotcha... they have usernames now, but even with those you have to have to bootstrap it with a number/identity.
ortekkabout 2 hours ago
They will allow registering without phone number as a paid option soon.
mmoossabout 1 hour ago
Signal's mission is to provide maximized privacy in a form the non-technical public can use.

A messaging service filled with bots and spammers is not usable, and possibly not affordable to Signal (what proportion of resources would be spent on spam/bots). What is a more private, usable solution for filtering them out than using a phone number?

Lots of security geeks want Signal to adopt practices unusable to the public. They've made clear that unsusable security is not in their mission.