Pentium II at 600Mhz with Voodoo 3 Emulated on 86Box with M6 Mac Mini

hhugh4life about 4 hours ago 30 commentsRead Article on nyaa.sh

ZH version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

88% Positive

Analyzed from 633 words in the discussion.

Discussion (30 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

bbarn•about 1 hour ago

But can it emulate having two voodoo II's and a desk fan pointed at it?

kar1181•about 3 hours ago

86box is really fun, and the m4+ macs are great at running it. I've been working on a custom OS designed specifically for the pentium 2 core/isa (trying to write an high performance *nix for 1997-1999 for quake 1/2). 86box runs very faithfully to the real silicon p2s (and voodoo 3) I have without the nuisance of having to copy code over to it in development.

walrus01•about 3 hours ago

Emulated llama whipping, what an era we live in

tomaskafka•about 2 hours ago

I love it! The great 2026 benchmark is a native Turok (I vividly remember that 30fps low poly iguana looking as real as Jurassic Park in my childhood), Unreal and Q3A.

brnt•about 1 hour ago

I had that with GTA3: seemed photorealistic at the time.

initramfs•about 2 hours ago

I thought 86Box only emulated binaries, so I was a little confused on how it designates CPU speed and architecture. Good to know though...

AshamedCaptain•about 1 hour ago

That's Box86 [not a joke].

artisinal•about 1 hour ago

I vaguely remember running a PlayStation emulator (bleem?) on my Pentium III 1Ghz processor.

Once the Mac mini M8 is released, will we be able to emulate a Pentium III which runs PlayStation emulation?

petaleverbloom•about 1 hour ago

It ran VisualBoyAdvance pretty well! I haven't tried Project64 but I think the emulated Voodoo3 should support Jabos D3D6/7 backend with older versions. Was quite thrilled today to see my article blow up so if there's anything you'd want me to test I have mostly a free weekend.

netsharc•about 3 hours ago

Ah, those specs will run Need for Speed II smoothly!

jwrallie•about 2 hours ago

Wait, if single core performance matters, could it be that the MacBook Neo could be a good machine for 86Box? I assume thermal throttling could be a limitation but in theory it should be as fast as an M3 for single core performance.

petaleverbloom•about 1 hour ago

Author of the article/site here, I have a MacBook neo I could test 86box on with this same build. But practically speaking yes, it has reasonable ST perf and my guess would be it's competitive with the best x86 chips available today for this workload.

hncbw02z5a•about 2 hours ago

Glide works, yeah, but check your 86Box dynarec setting first. I had Unreal crawling on an M2 until I realized I was still on the interpreter core.

farseer•about 2 hours ago

Emulated Voodoo 3? Does that mean I can run games using Glide?

mglvsky•about 1 hour ago

I'd play Messiah[1] - such a hidden gem

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messiah_(video_game)

petaleverbloom•about 1 hour ago

Yes, you can.

raverbashing•about 1 hour ago

Computers got better, true

But those were much cooler than the ones today

KellyCriterion•about 2 hours ago

But can it run Crysis? :-D

LetMeLogin•about 2 hours ago

It can run Doom for sure.

pjmlp•about 2 hours ago

Hardly, given that the hardware predates the game.

normie3000•about 1 hour ago

I think most games are written to run on hardware that predates them.

pjmlp•11 minutes ago

Kind of, while chronological true, that misses the hardware configuration that the games expect to be available as means to execute their binary code.

ranger_danger•about 2 hours ago

I would be interested to see a performance comparison with qemu and softgpu (https://github.com/JHRobotics/softgpu).

AshamedCaptain•42 minutes ago

Or a Rosetta-based emulator (like Parallels). But 86Box is going to be very bad there.

While they claim "accuracy" as one of the goals for 86Box, I believe accuracy is overrated in PC emus (you don't really need that much accuracy due to the variety of PC clones, and emus are not that accurate anyway). For me the biggest point for using 86Box over other PC emulators/virtualizers is the large selection of virtual hardware available to emulate, not performance.

kmeaw•7 minutes ago

86Box is just accurate enough to run the original unmodified firmware. It does not emulate cache and RAM behavior, so you won't get performance-related accuracy. You are likely to succeed in Spectre-like attacks against an emulated 386, which shouldn't be possible on a real thing.

If you don't care and just want to go faster on a modern x86 CPU, you can replace the CPU emulation part of 86Box with a hypervisor. I tried running a Socket 7 motherboard firmware on Linux's KVM - given the chipset emulation is correct, it works: it amusingly identifies an AMD Zen5 running at 3GHz as "Unknown-S CPU at M60MHz" and boots to a DOS prompt.

qubex•about 2 hours ago

Now I want to emulate my dual PIII-450 with an ATI Rage Fury 128 running Windows 2000.

sdcfgy•about 2 hours ago

Heh I had one of those back in the day with an Intel made L440GX+ and SCSI disks. One of my favourite machines.

qubex•about 1 hour ago

Dual processor machines back then were rather exotic. I was coming from a period on BeOS (“one processor per person is not enough!”) and I’ve never really been able to endure non-SMP machines since 1995. It’s common now of course. I had 512 MB of RAM and a pair of 9.4 (?) SCSI disks connected in RAID-0: I liked to live dangerously back in the day. It ended in tears a few times but I also had a 2GB Iomega Jaz drive for backups… yeah… eventually I switched to DVD-R… yeah… there’s holes in my records.

sdcfgy•25 minutes ago

Very cool! Never tried BeOS back in the day. I heard good things though.

Amazing times. I actually upgraded to that from a Compaq Professional Workstation 5000 which had dual Pentium Pro 180s in it. Ran NT and occasionally FreeBSD. Cost me a small fortune at the time. Backups here were to a SCSI DLT (can't remember capacity) that was chucked in the trash at work. All it needed was a minor repair.

sneak•22 minutes ago

I miss Windows 2000. Win32 was such a good time in desktop computing.