Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

75% Positive

Analyzed from 173 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#lumina#typescript#itself#language#https#com#example#written#compiler#don

Discussion (7 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

tegeekabout 3 hours ago
A good effort, but i failed to see any use case why someone will select Lumina over TypeScript. Infact Lumina itself is written in TypeScript.
afavour13 minutes ago
Surely the ability to compile your WASM is a pretty big benefit over TypeScript, if it’s something you need.
embedding-shapeabout 1 hour ago
I'd also steer clear of any language using TypeScript for the compiler itself, even TypeScript themselves don't want to use TypeScript anymore for the compiler, don't make the same mistake yourself.
light_ideas5 days ago
Lumina is a statically typed, web-native language that compiles to JavaScript and WebAssembly. It has HM type inference, algebraic types, traits, a reactive UI runtime, a REPL, an LSP, and a browser demo written in Lumina itself. The current demo runs without React and uses a Vite plugin that compiles .lm files directly for the browser.

GitHub: https://github.com/nyigoro/lumina-lang npm: https://www.npmjs.com/package/lumina-lang

I’d love feedback on the language design, the web-native direction, and the developer experience.

Simon-curtisabout 5 hours ago
on the examples page, the example for string interpolation is a simple function example
woadwarrior01about 4 hours ago
Seems like a front-end bug. Click on the tab brings up the right example.

https://nyigoro.abrdns.com/#lumina

mapcarsabout 3 hours ago
It would be helpful to show some clarification on what the benefits are compared to TypeScript