Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 162 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#sap#more#usage#system#microsoft#headcount#service#per#license#person

Discussion (6 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

monospaced•about 5 hours ago
SAP has been doing something similar for years now. They call it indirect use. If a system integrates with SAP and accesses data you have to pay licensing fees. Even if you host the SAP system yourself.
benbristow•about 4 hours ago
latand6•about 6 hours ago
What the hell? If a company gets more efficient and uses fewer people - Microsoft's immediate reaction is to figure out how to invent some kind of digital seats so they can keep taxing the headcount. Lol
1718627440•about 5 hours ago
To that makes perfect sense. You get charged for usage of their service and they chose to do that by assuming an average usage per license / person and charging that. When you get to cram in more usage/person by using a third party, they either charge you for access via that third-party or that could also just increase prices per personal license. I guess they figured the latter would be less popular or they can't do it, because they have existing contracts.

They don't care about your headcount, but you do use more service.

WhereIsTheTruth•about 5 hours ago
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is exactly why you should never let Microslop win