Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

71% Positive

Analyzed from 1351 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#cloud#still#don#home#media#https#internet#going#thing#homelab

Discussion (35 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

h4kunamataabout 1 hour ago
Up to early 2000s, people would go to the internet to have fun, everything was new, it was the mass migration from analog to digital era.

2020s, people are going offline to have fun.

Hoemalb is becoming a thing even for people who never had experience with computer, people hosting their own documents, movies, music, backups in case things go bad.

Even some companies have realised the price of going cloud, some are moving back to on-prem hardware with full control.

TacticalCoderabout 1 hour ago
> Homelab is becoming a thing even for people who never had experience with computer, ...

Oh totally. I got my brother, who lives on the other side of the world and who's not a dev/sysadmin, just a poweruser, to install Proxmox and he's now using GPU passthrough to have VMs run different AI models (in either Linux or Windows) for image generation, experimenting, etc. He's also got a NAS with RAID etc.

To me a homelab is the 2020's version of having fun with computing: there's something incredibly refreshing in disconnecting my sub-LAN from the Internet and still have music, movies, private pastebin (yup I use this at times between computers for simple stuff I don't want to both scp'ing), private Git repositories, complete backup system (including offline HDDs/SSDs that I rotate into a safe at the bank), etc.

A movie projector, a dumb one, is another very cool thing: connected to nothing but a HDMI cable (not that HDMI is the best standard ever but it does the job).

And to be sure I can still code and work without having a nanny holding my hand as if I was a toddler, I regularly have coding sessions where I don't use Claude Code (but I also pay for a subscription: these things aren't mutually exclusive).

For anyone who wants to have a fun, a used HP Workstation with ECC memory is basically $200 and makes a perfectly fine server at home. Doesn't need to be up 24/7 either: my online service that is up 24/7 is my unbound DNS resolver and I run that one on a Raspberry Pi (for the low power consumption). The rest of my homelab (two Proxmox servers) is basically something I only need when I'm awake/at my desk. So I turn them off at night.

You never go full cloud.

asveikau42 minutes ago
It's kind of funny that people are talking about "home labs" as a new thing because I've been running some form of servers on consumer PC hardware in my home since around 1998. For me this was an inseparable part of getting to know Linux and *BSD in that era.

I just I'm just old though.

downut28 minutes ago
1988. On a math TA salary I paid $600 for an 80MB (That's megabytes) hard drive. I had dialup. I also had Turbo Pascal and an 8087 coprocessor. I was a MS student in computational math AKA numerical analysis.

It was goddam glorious.

Took until 1995ish to have a homelab to experiment with FreeBSD and later Linux over a 10-Base-T network with gcc/g++ and dialup access to this thing called "The World Wide Web". The browser had a throbber dinosaur.

It was even more goddam glorious.

Right now I've got three main systems with decent CPUs and 128GB of memory, and several emphemeral satellite systems. With 8GB of NVIDIA VRAM I'm running gemma4:31b just fine on my media system. Which curiously enough has, ah... media on it.

I feel like I have a good idea how EV owners feel right now. (We have a Prius.)

MinimalAction17 minutes ago
I echo similar sentiments. It is high time to choose self-hosting over handing over essentials to the cloud. You don't know when it could be inaccessible due to plethora of reasons. It is just that, every time I looked into setting up a home lab, it feels cost prohibitively expensive.
observationist8 minutes ago
We're teetering on the brink of highly capable software agents that can run on a phone using a local model, that can manage things like basic digital hygiene, operating a self-hosted cloud, with tailscale and other private vpns that can leverage your own home internet service with a well maintained set of firewall rules and level of locked-down access that it's actually practical.

An inspired nerd can do it right now, but grandma will be able to do a curated, accessible set of things by the end of the year, and by the end of 2027, the internet and self hosted things are going to be incredibly different. When people can self host plex and anonymously pirate anything, and their local model can do the ethically gray area stuff like ensure everything is done so they don't get caught - cloud services can't compete with that. Cable and netflix and spotify and the rest are going to have to up their game, and not do the stupid lashing out, price gouging, hunting the pirates type of thing or they're just going to burn down faster.

We're headed for some really cool, interesting times.

h4kunamata11 minutes ago
>It is just that, every time I looked into setting up a home lab, it feels cost prohibitively expensive.

You would say that if you look into my 12U rack right now, only 6 months ago all I had was 2x Dell SFF second hand computer from eBay that might have costed me AUD300.

Before that, I had one of those miniPC with two network ports that cost me AUD200. I installed Proxmox in it, then OPNSense (router) and pihole as virtual machine, it ran like that for years

Install Proxmox in them and you can run eveything.

This is the major misconception regarding homelab, you absolutely don't need expensive gear. A single miniPC + Proxmox is all you need to start, try to have at least 16GB of memory, 256GB NVMe is more than enough to start.

Don't let those massive homelab setup you see on the internet tell you that is the only way :)

440bxabout 3 hours ago
As it appears to be hugged to death, archive link: https://archive.ph/qsdc3
getnormalityabout 2 hours ago
Sometimes you fuck the cloud, sometimes the cloud fucks you
selimthegrimabout 2 hours ago
Nope
keyle27 minutes ago
Flared by the cloud.. sic
consumer45140 minutes ago
lol, as a VPN user, I get to read nothing. No offense to archive.org, I get it.
miniman1337about 2 hours ago
the irony
philipnee17 minutes ago
The reliability, speed and internet connectivity makes local first more appealing. Honestly - i host my own webpage, file server, and some compute locally.
uriegasabout 1 hour ago
The idea of offshoring computing is good. However, the cloud developed as a centralized computing platform instead of a distributed one. This has created power dynamics that harm customers. The same happened with social media, and has happened to other industries. I think it would be better for customers if there were many small cloud providers and they could easily switch between them. But even migrating from one cloud provider to another is a huge endeavor these days.
rhet0ricaabout 2 hours ago
The title is an erroneous translation of the Japanese original; it is actually: テキストファイル好きで奇妙な帽子をかぶった男が、天気とセックスをするという計画を発表する。
dillydoggabout 1 hour ago
Can you more accurately translate this to English for us?
cyanmagentaabout 1 hour ago
According to Google Translate: “A man who loves text files and wears a peculiar hat announces a plan to have sex with the weather.”

Hope this helps.

dillydoggabout 1 hour ago
Keep hoping!
ghcabout 1 hour ago
It took me way too long to get that.
tomhowabout 2 hours ago
Thanks, Macroexpanded, and some others too...

Fuck the Cloud (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10771539 - Dec 2015 (219 comments)

Fuck the cloud (2009) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2984083 - Sept 2011 (2 comments)

Fuck the Cloud - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=441885 - Jan 2009 (23 comments)

josefritzishereabout 2 hours ago
Resource Limit Is Reached - Hug of death
FaridIOabout 2 hours ago
The irony.
furyofantaresabout 2 hours ago
The sequel to Kiss the sky

Anyway, I love how well GDPR demonstrated this:

> Insult, berate and make fun of any company that offers you something like a “sharing” site that makes you push stuff in that you can’t make copies out of or which you can’t export stuff out of. They will burble about technology issues. They are fucking lying. They might go off further about business models. They are fucking stupid.

markus_zhangabout 2 hours ago
I think very soon we will read “Fuck AI”.
echelonabout 2 hours ago
Neither would be fucked if they were open source.

Or if they had a ton of viable competition.

operatingthetanabout 1 hour ago
Is not most cloud tech based on open-source? Without Linux I feel like we would have seen cloud take off 20 years later than it did.
johnsmith1840about 1 hour ago
Most cloud features are open source tools with special sauce sprinkeled in. But at the same time these companies heavily fund said OS project so I suppose it's not just pure community based work.
ajrossabout 1 hour ago
Counter-take: this was almost entirely wrong, and the author should be embarassed looking back after 17 years.

I mean, it was 2009. How much of your personal data from then is still around on non-archival media you still control? Even among the geek set here, the answer is likely to be "almost none of it". At best it's "backed up" on media you haven't validated.

Or more likely, copied somewhere else to keep it secured. Like... Dropbox or Backblaze or S3 one of those, you guessed it, CLOUD services.

Likewise, do you still have your email from 2009 online in a useful form? Gmail users, many of them in this very thread, still do.

bee_riderabout 1 hour ago
I have all my music from 2009, shuffled from drive to drive. It out-survived my subscriptions to on-demand music streaming services (I do Pandora for discovery but don’t like the feeling of building an Amazon streaming “library” that will actually vanish when I stop paying).

I think the drive that held my old home directory might have died, though.

Terr_36 minutes ago
Uhhh, me? 20-30 years of documents, photos, emails, the email address itself, instant-messaging logs, etc. Even a downloaded zip of every comment I ever made on Reddit.

The main exception would be Google Photos pictures that have been uploaded from my phone but which I haven't curated and downloaded yet.

I predict I will maintain my custom-domain email address much longer than if I had used Gmail, given the attrition rate of bannings without support.

> on non-archival media you still control [...] Or more likely, copied somewhere else to keep it secured.

Hold up, is this OR or XOR? Why is "non-archival" media important?

The virtue is having a copy under my own control which has some protection from bit-rot.

That isn't voided simply because one has an off-site back up against catastrophic loss. That copy being in "the cloud" isn't meaningfully different than when it was going to a singular Linux machine that someone else owned.

Advertisement