Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

100% Positive

Analyzed from 240 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#chinese#publications#funding#help#current#nber#citation#rates#right#maga

Discussion (10 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

MrGilbert•about 2 hours ago
I cannot help but wonder how many decades it will take the U.S. to recover from the damage that the current administration is causing, both economically and in trust on a global scale. While in no way comparable, as a German, that topic feels familiar non the less - and to this day, it's a long and rocky road.
jruohonen•about 2 hours ago
From the liked NBER study:

"Between 58 and 68 percent of citations to Chinese publications come from other Chinese publications, even for breakthrough work. This contrasts sharply with other regions, where cross-border citation rates are substantially higher."

https://www.nber.org/digest?page=1&perPage=50

3eb7988a1663•about 2 hours ago
Surely English fluency is somewhat relevant.
zb3•about 2 hours ago
The more Chinese publications, the bigger share of their citation rates, right?
andretti1977•about 2 hours ago
… “Ignorance is strength” might was well be an official MAGA motto…
rolph•about 2 hours ago
not according to this article. the attempt is to defund research, gov can make money out of thin air to an extent, but not indefinately, and it has to be paid for in real terms.

private interests have greater actual holdings than gov.

"they" are not winning, they are chasing a major provider of high standard of living, right out the door.

gverrilla•about 2 hours ago
Absolutely deleting progress.
rootusrootus•about 2 hours ago
As is so typical in politics, whether it is countries, parties, or legislation, irony dominates the naming. Democratic People's Republic of Korea, PATRIOT act, MAGA, the list goes on.
jmclnx•about 2 hours ago
China is incensing funding, US is cutting funding so this will only help China
wileydragonfly•about 2 hours ago
NIH grant funding is still down about 35% and they’re lying about it. They’re not updating Reporter fully so the director has been able to obfuscate it. Graduate programs are reducing admissions and I imagine fewer potential scientists are interested in the PhD path given “current situation.” So I imagine it’s going to take several “good” years to undo what’s been done.