DE version is available. Content is displayed in original English for accuracy.
Advertisement
Advertisement
⥠Community Insights
Discussion Sentiment
70% Positive
Analyzed from 752 words in the discussion.
Trending Topics
#employees#meta#company#isn#more#using#models#training#https#going

Discussion (47 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews
Yes they could have accessed logs before but thereâs a difference between directed checking after incidents and active surveillance at scale.
I work at a tech firm in India, and we are encouraged to create skills.md based on the traits of our colleagues, with the intention of reducing key personnel risk. A handful of engineers were let go as the result of a re-alignment, and their AI counterparts are actively maintaining their code.
I wonder if this is where they are going.
Like that "Scott is an asswipe who never agrees to any idea that isn't his" or what?
If keystrokes are captured, isn't this a double-edged sword where maybe the company might be inadvertently collecting evidence against itself if there's an investigation and the investigators want to collect keystrokes?
It had no impact of recruiters trying to win me back since then.
Then theyâll deploy models trained on this, and begin capturing employees using AIs that are good at using AIs to do work.
Repeat a few times and theyâll start capturing the keystrokes from people mashing their heads into keyboards with dispair and exclaiming, âWhy canât these models do anything anymore!!â
These models already have the skills that humans were using them for, so either by training the models to use subagents or simply inlining the work done by the AI, you have a much easier time training the model to perform tasks from a human-distribution. The humans have done the work of making the human-distribution look more like an AI distribution.
And you expect Meta employees, of all people, to believe this?
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47851086
Someone had to do it, distasteful though it may be. Could be quite hilarious what it learns in the process.
Sure, you can do everything a human can, but it also seems VERY inefficient
As an alternative, maybe you could just do network in/out?
More proof that they do not care about you at all. This is Meta's way of moving fast and destroying everything at all costs.