Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

67% Positive

Analyzed from 546 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#telescopes#earth#constellations#radio#sky#satellite#near#space#astronomy#astronomical

Discussion (20 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

albert_e•about 1 hour ago
Why are satellite trails npt continuous lines

Is the camera exposure taking a few seconds of break between takes that get stacked later with some "missing" moments in between?

debugnik•about 1 hour ago
My guess is the camera itself was taking photos of shorter exposure and the final image was composed in post-production, yes.
originalvichy•about 4 hours ago
I fear this is only the start of it. A minimum of 3-4 constellations more will probably be launched in the near future (Russia, China, EU).

Their obvious dual-use nature makes them tempting, and a military target if a large conflict will take place in the near future. I hope their lower orbit will help any space junk burn up fast.

ragebol•about 4 hours ago
Yeah, I kinda get why astronomers are not particularly happy with satellite constellations.
adev_•about 2 hours ago
And this is just the visible spectrum.

The situation is one order of magnitude worst in radio-astronomy.

It is fair to state that satellite constellations will certainly be the main obstacle to multiple major scientific discoveries in the next decade.

ultratalk•about 2 hours ago
Opinion: We need to move our astronomical observation equipment off of Earth and onto other bodies, especially radio astronomy, which, unlike telescopes that operate in other wavelengths, is still affected by Earth's emissions in LEO/near-Earth space. We should put a radio telescope on the far side of the moon [0] to benefit from the thousands of kilometers of lunar material separating Earth's emissions from telescopes.

[0] https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO50100.2021.9438165

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Crater_Radio_Telescope

adrian_b•about 1 hour ago
Unfortunately, that seems to be the only solution.

However, it has serious disadvantages. It will exclude the poorer from astronomical research, except within the limits enabled by whatever cooperation the richer will be willing to do with them.

For the richer, that will make astronomical research much more expensive. When even USA, who claims to be the richest country, cuts a lot of the scientific funding, this makes likely a great reduction in the research targets that could be accomplished, even if a Lunar array of telescopes and radiotelescopes and communication relays for them were approved.

While professionals might still be able to do some work, the amateurs will be able less and less to enjoy the sight of the distant Universe.

There are already many years since I have become unable to see the sky that I enjoyed looking at when young, because it cannot be seen from the city where I live, due to light pollution (and high buildings). To see it again, I would have to go somewhere up in the mountains, far from a city or village, but I have not succeeded to do this recently. Even there now you can hardly look at the sky without seeing satellites, and it will only become much worse.

Nowadays there are many children who have never seen even once the sky that our ancestors were seeing every night, so many passages from old texts that mention the sky are unintelligible for them.

maxnoe•about 1 hour ago
Our telescopes actually need the (or at least an) atmosphere to function.

There are some classes of observatories, which you cannot build in space but which are still affected by satellites to some degree.

Aboutplants•21 minutes ago
Any chance of CubeSat style of telescopes at some point?
christophilus•about 2 hours ago
Agreed. It’s the only solution short of a ban on constellations.
iso1631•16 minutes ago
> . We should put a radio telescope on the far side of the moon [0] to benefit from the thousands of kilometers of lunar material separating Earth's emissions from telescopes.

Do you really think a starlink style installation won't be put in orbit of the moon before such a telescope could be funded?

ciroduran•about 4 hours ago
I'm rebuilding my RSS feed collection, and having pretty astronomy pictures is a fine addition. Thanks!
gasi•about 3 hours ago
So cool! Zoom in to find out: https://zoomhub.net/0w8pN
aa-jv•about 1 hour ago
Hot take: We're in the first stages of building our own Dyson sphere and therefore comets are only useful in the context of capturing them for that purpose.

;)

w-ll•about 4 hours ago
if i could imagine what a Sophon from 3 body problem would look like. this is kind of it.
khazhoux•about 3 hours ago
Is this all / mostly Starlink?
vednig•about 2 hours ago
It's a set of network satellites for sure either by Eutelsat or Starlink in 70:20 ratio 10% being other providers

But all of them being LEO for sure.

renerick•about 3 hours ago
That looks so cool, ngl!