Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

38% Positive

Analyzed from 1207 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#crime#petty#surveillance#theft#more#bike#world#safety#right#state

Discussion (34 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

dw_arthur•12 minutes ago
A surveillance state was always inevitable once wireless networking, GPS, and cameras were ubiquitous. If you say this isn't true, show me anywhere in the world with these technologies that is not headed down this path.
2ndorderthought•about 1 hour ago
The time to resist against these policies and technologies was 2-5 years ago.

Every single person in the US's future, safety, rights and freedom is currently at stake. There is no more time left to wait and see how things play out.

gmuslera•21 minutes ago
More like 13 years ago, when Snowden revelations made the reach of this public. Nothing was done, and this kept expanding till today state of things. No one should be surprised.

And over the domestic surveillance, that had some complaints back in that time, there is the point of foreign surveillance and intervention, that had no slowdown back then, so you can figure out where that should be today. At least Americans have some saying on their government and policies, but for the rest of the world is just the new normal.

an0malous•about 1 hour ago
Flock is a YC company. I don’t think the resistance will be organized on HN in spite of its ostensibly hacker ethos
2ndorderthought•about 1 hour ago
There are enough normal people here it is still worth trying.
michaelsshaw•22 minutes ago
The hacker ethos of this site is gone. This website is so full of faux-intellectualism it's insane. Literally one of the top stories on the site right now is a basic chess concept, literally week 1 shit, called "Zugzwang". Not to mention all the Apple and Musk dickriders on this site, which is highly disturbing.

The ethos of this website is mostly just anarcho-capitalist but lacking in any foundation of even the most basic understanding of ideological concepts.

JumpCrisscross•32 minutes ago
> time to resist against these policies and technologies was 2-5 years ago

The time to resist the next crop of policies and technologies is today.

And I disagree the ground was more fertile for action in Covid. The silver lining to the AI companies’ PR and political ineptitude is that there is widespread, bipartisan pushback against tech in all stripes.

lotsofpulp•about 1 hour ago
Enemy of the State came out in 1998, and the capabilities in that movie were not far fetched, just lacking in bandwidth.
vostrocity•10 minutes ago
One idea I haven't seen much discussion on is "provably beneficial surveillance" [1], which builds off of Nick Bostrom's vulnerable world hypothesis. It seems like the best path forward.

1. https://michaelnotebook.com/optimism/index.html

JumpCrisscross•33 minutes ago
What’s the fix? What’s a simple rule change that would, at the very least, take these data out of law enforcement’s hands outside the most-necessary situations?
_factor•29 minutes ago
An open source community driven surveillance network that alerts the community when it is accessed by a select list of “trusted” governing officials. Clearly outlined access rules that are policy driven, technically controlled and auditable.

Sure Flock, we buy your safety pitch. We just don’t trust you.

JumpCrisscross•23 minutes ago
> surveillance network that alerts the community when it is accessed by a select list of “trusted” governing officials

This is the worst of all worlds. Actual criminal investigations get thwarted or the reporting requirement gets diluted to the point of being useless (“someone looked for something today!”). And a burden of vigilance shifted onto the public.

gzread•29 minutes ago
None, because they are above the rules. You need actual enforcement.

Or the other guy's community network idea but it would have to also publish the realtime activities and whereabouts of all politicians who voted against making this illegal.

Much like the law that stopped video rental companies from telling what their customers were renting, that passed after some politicians had their video rental histories leaked.

JumpCrisscross•21 minutes ago
> they are above the rules

They’re above the rules for a political cycle because we’re shifting to a system of spoils. That doesn’t change that everything they’re doing right now is legal. (Outside ICE. They’re a warren of criminality right now.)

SilverElfin•about 1 hour ago
Age verification is part of this. Submit your IDs to use AI. Now they know all about you. All done for “safety” but we know that’s an excuse.

https://reclaimthenet.org/senate-panel-backs-guard-act-ai-ag...

kelseyfrog•8 minutes ago
They love control almost in a fetishistic way. It gets them off.
2ndorderthought•about 1 hour ago
So is AI and the push for more data centers than the country can afford or supply power too.

And the ever increasing desire to break encryption.

And the increase in technology companies who have metadata about us citizens becoming offense and defense contractors.

And... The list is so long.

google234123•about 1 hour ago
Hopefully this will translate into less petty crime- most theft now goes unpunished. I want to live in a society where bikes aren't stolen
kibwen•11 minutes ago
Surely you realize that police states exist to protect the ones on top, and have no incentive to give a shit about the ones on the bottom.
xantronix•39 minutes ago
If you want less petty crime, bring back social safety nets. Pay people better.

I'm dead serious.

- Addendum: People generally don't resort to petty crime for no good reason. They do it because some need is not being met, or they have become socially outcast due to some systemic failure. When people feel they have little autonomy to exist in a meaningful way, and even being poor is expensive and criminalised, of course you'll see petty crime everywhere. Cracking down on the "undesirables" won't make them go away, it'll just make the issue more pronounced.

2ndorderthought•about 1 hour ago
A better economy would help more than surveiling every single persons every moves and all of their communications.

I would literally buy you a bicycle to change your mind. Or sit down and review countries where theft is minimal so we could brainstorm real solutions.

kashunstva•31 minutes ago
Maybe the U.S. could stop normalizing and modelling blatant criminality as a first step, in lieu of mass warrantless surveillance. Just yesterday, the U.S. president was giving what could be generously construed as a speech, in which he said of U.S. naval activities around the Strait of Hormuz: “We’re taking the cargo. We’re taking the oil. We’re like pirates.”
henry2023•about 1 hour ago
1984 was not an instruction manual.
jmcgough•about 1 hour ago
Doubtful, it's never really deemed worth LEOs time to pursue bike thieves.
brandonmenc•about 1 hour ago
Then we need to make it work their time by bringing back broken windows policing.
2ndorderthought•about 1 hour ago
Or solve the problem by addressing the root causes of crime like other societies do. The American prison industrial complex is not a cure for a sick society. It's a profitable black hole that encourages recidivism at the expense of tax payers.
onemoresoop•12 minutes ago
Wait until you get targeted politically.
pessimizer•about 1 hour ago
Your goals are petty and short-sighted. One nice thing about the current state of economics, technology, labor and inflation is that we'll have fewer people who can only imagine suffering to the extent of having a bicycle stolen, and would not give the worst people in the world an infinite amount of power in order to prevent this from happening to them again.

The 20% of the country that thinks that shoplifting is the real problem are a problem. They will always vote for the biggest liar.

I'm right now imagining a counterfactual world where there is no property crime or physical assault, and petty reactionaries are demanding surveillance in order to keep people from swearing.

energy123•9 minutes ago
You don't have control over whether petty reactionaries exist. Model them as non-sentient beings if it helps you analyze it dispassionately. They're going to react to public disorder by voting in pubic safety authoritarians like Bukele or Duterte with or without your permission. Thus everyone should care about shoplifting, the only disagreement is whether you care about the first or second order effects of it.
redwall_hp•11 minutes ago
Also, all property crime is a drop in the bucket compared to white collar crime. The people who are super concerned about petty theft are often the ones stealing massive amounts of money from everyone else and creating the situations that lead to petty theft.

Wage theft (minimum wage violations, forced off the clock work, withheld pay, etc) dwarfs robbery, burglary, and auto theft alone in dollar value. And that's just one kind of white collar crime.

We also have market manipulators, embezzlers, cons selling "wellness" bullshit, companies like Flock and Palantir conspiring to break constitutional amendments, Polymarket grifters, what have you.

I'd be happy with unlimited bike theft if those fucks all ended up in prison, but realistically it would lower the bike theft.

Der_Einzige•33 minutes ago
You're free to move to Singapore/South Korea/Japan whenever you want. Your USD (assuming you are one) will go far there, and if you are lucky enough to be white you will get treated like a king/queen there.

As it turns out, society is a lot more fun when there is just a bit of risk of crime. I'll 1000000000% take the additional freedom to do "stupid shit" in the USA over living in one of these boring dystopias.

analog8374•32 minutes ago
If it's a choice between stealing a bike and homelessness, I'll steal a bike. So the problem is the threat of homelessness. Right?
JumpCrisscross•30 minutes ago
> If it's a choice between stealing a bike and homelessness

This is a vanishingly-rare hypothetical in America.

Avicebron•26 minutes ago
But still a hypothetical, unlike rampant desperation and wealth inequality in America.