Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

67% Positive

Analyzed from 113 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#human#best#number#bots#seems#appreciate#sentiment#guess#verify#ness

Discussion (2 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

recursivecaveatabout 1 hour ago
I appreciate the sentiment I guess, but you can't really verify the human-ness of a poster. At best you can validate that at some point(s) they completed a human-is-present check. Doesn't necessarily mean anything about a given post. Moltbook (wow that feels like forever ago) has the inverse problem: you can just larp as a kooky bot. At best maybe you can do something like limit the number of bots to the number of people who are willing to set aside their personal credentials, which is probably way more bots than you can stand.
sakjur43 minutes ago
There's a C-suite of five people and a board of advisors I couldn't be bothered to count before their public beta for an AtProto instance.

That just seems too heavy an operation for my taste. Seems prone to either infighting or raising too much early capital.