Back to News
Advertisement
Advertisement

⚡ Community Insights

Discussion Sentiment

56% Positive

Analyzed from 2013 words in the discussion.

Trending Topics

#hosting#more#servers#don#netherlands#legitimate#where#company#those#companies

Discussion (88 Comments)Read Original on HackerNews

pocksuppet•3 days ago
We should note these are not even slightly legitimate hosting companies, lest anyone worry too much about their non-KYC offshore servers. These aren't hosting companies that ask little, they are just directly front companies for Russian intelligence, owned by members of Russian intelligence, they don't do anything else, they don't provide hosting service to regular people even if you want it (I have tried).

Unlike in Germany where I lost several social media accounts because my email service provider (pissmail) went to jail because someone signed up for his service and sent spam.

orbital-decay•3 days ago
>they don't provide hosting service to regular people even if you want it (I have tried)

That doesn't sound right. I used PQ.Hosting once when I needed a quick temporary VPS, just like many other legitimate users. Yes they never asked much, but they also used to ban users left and right even for torrenting, so it wasn't bulletproof in any meaningful sense. I'm sure they were into shady stuff though, since their IP quality used to be absolute crap, but they did provide legitimate services as well.

red-iron-pine•2 days ago
legal threats of torrenting == lots of attention. not really something that the SVR or GRU want on their secret servers.

plus they just gobble bandwidth. you want a bit to ensure your company looks real / makes some $$$ but you don't want to threaten your C2 nodes

dominikz•1 day ago
Dear Dr [my name]

After reviewing your updated customer information, we have decided to deactivate your account because of some concerns we have regarding this information. Therefore, we have cancelled all your existing products and orders with us.

Best regards

Your Hetzner Online Team

---

This is the email that I received, after I mistyped my credit card data, when creating an account on Hetzner Cloud. You don't have to be a big cloud company to enforce the KYC rules to defend against fraud.

I wonder how big/small wa pissmail? Would be good to know where is the threshold of sanity:

1. staying with smaller providers is cheaper (and you usually get non-AI customer support)

2. at the risk of stepping into something that makes you lose your data (like you did)

MuffinFlavored•3 days ago
> email service provider (pissmail)

I'm sorry this happened to you.

DetroitThrow•2 days ago
it was a good alternative to cock.li for some time. alas
pocksuppet•1 day ago
German authorities arrest people for running email services and then they are confused about why doesn't Germany have a Silicon-Valley-style tech industry.
nalekberov•3 days ago
Any source to back up your claims? Otherwise it seemed pretty much a conspiracy theory to me.
consp•3 days ago
The company inherited all their customers and equipment from a sanctioned company (according to the Dutch news report). Should be enough for most people.
chatmasta•3 days ago
That just means the sanctioned company was selling to sanctioned entities, not that it was only selling to them.
nalekberov•3 days ago
Sanctioned company != works for the government.
efitz•3 days ago
I’ve been on the defender side of security my whole career.

I know in some markets crime pays more than legitimate work, but it never ceases to amaze me how much thought, effort, planning, and engineering goes into providing infrastructure IT services for cybercriminals. The people involved definitely have the skills to be profitable at legitimate work; it just puzzles me that they choose to support criminals.

Aurornis•3 days ago
I watched the downfall and eventual jailing of someone who had a great job, career, and family after he started getting involved in cybercrime.

As far as I can make sense of it, he enjoyed the thrill of feeling superior to others: Evading the law, exploiting people who viewed as stupid, and enriching himself in the process.

He got caught through a mistake that was really dumb in retrospect. I think he believed his intellectual superiority combined with the stupidity of others so much that eventually he couldn’t imagine anyone catching him.

Rp8yXmdmr•2 days ago
> he enjoyed the thrill of feeling superior to others [...] He got caught through a mistake that was really dumb in retrospect.

It seems to be common occurrence. I still can't get over that one hacker who dumped stolen data on forum, to sell it/prove his capabilities, in form of tar.gz archive, that accidentally included his entire home directory

kspacewalk2•3 days ago
>As far as I can make sense of it, he enjoyed the thrill of feeling superior to others: Evading the law, exploiting people who viewed as stupid, and enriching himself in the process.

I sadly see this pattern of thinking far more often than I want to in my fellow eastern Europeans.

kirubakaran•3 days ago
Let's not generalize, even if you feel like you can say that because you're a member of a group you're generalizing. It's unfair to most of the people in any group being generalized.
pbgcp2026•2 days ago
His stupidity was to let you see him. Let that sink in.
KellyCriterion•3 days ago
sounds like Markus Braun & Jan Marsalek / Wirecard, the fraudsters :-D
cm2012•3 days ago
Sounds like Breaking Bad
thewebguyd•3 days ago
It's not easy to go legit, especially in today's job market, depending on where you live in the world also.

The US is unique with its high salaries for tech work (on the lower end of those of high salaries is pure ops work like this though). If you're in a country where the average sysadmin salary is substantially lower (to pick on Eastern Europe for a minute, you're looking at the equivalent of ~$30-35k USD/year), it's not hard to see why its tempting to go the cybercrime route.

locknitpicker•3 days ago
> to pick on Eastern Europe for a minute, you're looking at the equivalent of ~$30-35k USD/year

This is a disingenuous claim. Not only are there software engineers in rich western European countries that in absolute terms earn less than that but also your east European software engineer still earns multiple times their country's average salary.

goobatrooba•3 days ago
I think s/he meant that if you earn 30k it's easy to be tempted by crime because the numbers are big. What night not tempt a Google engineer might tempt a telecoms infrastructure key from Anytinytown, Moldova/Romania/...

That said I don't think there are many good software engineers that earn less than that in Western Europe. Net maybe, but certainly not gross, and if it's net that covers anything from pension security to healthcare, meaning you can live a decent life in most places.

r_lee•3 days ago
why is this downvoted?
KellyCriterion•3 days ago
...because on HN, experiences which somehow contradict the perspective when salaries are highly varying across countries, esp. when someone decides to pick an explicit example, which, even if it shows the truth, is against the base-assumption of the reader of a comment.

To put it somehow dimplomatic :-D

parliament32•3 days ago
Imagine working for an organization where 1) cybersecurity is actually the #1 priority, ahead of "shareholder value" and all the other gobblygook, 2) you get to design systems where you actually have to assume that every other entity is malicious (not the usual carve-outs like "oh yeah we do zero trust.. but our entire management plane is Azure-managed it's unavoidable"), 3) your budget is effectively unlimited, and 4) you get paid several factors more than you would in private industry.
r_lee•3 days ago
> The people involved definitely have the skills to be profitable at legitimate work; it just puzzles me that they choose to support criminals.

I don't think it's that easy to go legit. having a tech job nowadays is already a luxury

derefr•3 days ago
I wouldn't advise thinking of it as "providing infrastructure IT services to cybercriminals", as if these people are primarily IT people, running primarily infrastructure, who just happen to favor this audience.

I would rather advise thinking of these efforts as various cybercriminal groups going through the schlep of setting up their own backend IT infrastructure for their own use (because they couldn't find anyone to host them); and then, with built infra in hand, either:

1. realizing that their own needs were emblematic of a more-general unmet market demand for "don't ask, don't tell" hosting, and so branching out into hosting as a secondary business;

2. taking the charade of a hosting company they made up when e.g. registering for an ASN, and deciding that the more real they make that charade, the more it protects them; and so slapping together a facade of a hosting site (that serves no real customers and has no real control-plane);

3. or deciding that having real customers with actual legitimate traffic coming from their ASN further legitimizes them (and makes other ASNs more wary to just block them wholesale), and so actually standing up the facilities of your average VPS provider on some single sad box somewhere — probably running some turn-key IaaS appliance (usually not OpenStack, more likely some shoddy old thing they bought on a cybercrime marketplace);

4. or (and I think this is the most common route) chatting with cybercriminal friends of theirs, and those friends hitting them up for hosting when they realize that they've actually built something out for themselves; and this gradually just evolving into a de-facto hosting arm of the business (as they accept more of these "high-touch" word-of-mouth customers; eventually begin to feel burdened by manually configuring their systems to accommodate these customers; and so begin to automate things.)

pocksuppet•1 day ago
Both forms exist. There are real hosting companies that just turn a blinder eye to crime than others, and those ones should maybe be forced to divest from certain customers but shouldn't be completely raided. And there are cybercrime groups who form fake hosting companies. These ones were from the latter group. I tried to rent servers from them once, but they don't actually take customers because they aren't a real hosting company.
davidwritesbugs•3 days ago
In a previous life I've employed contractors and software engineers to run a criminal website. Motivations for my guys were that it was well paid work that was technically challenging in order to evade enforcement agencies, and was 'fun' in that respect; they were "sticking it to than man (my service was regarded as moral by all my users & others); and there wasn't so much work about that they could pick and choose; lastly, I was a good employer because I had to be!!
fancythat•3 days ago
Because they cannot be profitable. Job market is not the same on both ends. If you are east European and you try to get a job in an international corporation, the in all cases offer salaries adjusted for regional averages, unless you are willing to reallocate. Only few startups and FAANG like companies, often compensation in line what is received in the western world.

And there is also a thrill of doing it, which other guys already mentioned.

amelius•3 days ago
Cybersecurity is always last on the budget list. It is not easy to make money working in cybersecurity.

The only upside here is that criminals will (through legislation) eventually force companies to invest more.

SoftTalker•3 days ago
Some people are just born into it. Mafia families, etc. There were some very smart people in the American mob, running scams that were immensely profitable. Eventually they get caught though, and with the ease and pervasivness of electronic surveillance today, it's pretty much impossible to do it anymre at least if you're anywhere where the authorities care about it (edit to add: and aren't in on it).
sandeepkd•3 days ago
If we use one of the comments from here that it was done at the behest of some government then its more like the offensive team of a legitimate government. Pretty much every thing can be colored grey that way and one just needs to find people that they can persuade or convince for their cause.
cryptoegorophy•2 days ago
You were not born in eastern Europe that’s why. That’s the whole Eastern European mind set - the only way to succeed is to rip people off or scam. Anything else is already taken or no money in it or government will take it away from you.
afroboy•2 days ago
> it just puzzles me that they choose to support criminals.

Same reason for CIA and NSA engineers.

dist-epoch•3 days ago
You fail to take into account the ideological angle.

Some people are ready to die for their beliefs. Others just to run businesses supporting their causes.

3 of the 4 persons named have russian links (a large number of Moldovan citizens are ethnic russians).

spwa4•3 days ago
> Some people are ready to die for their beliefs.

Really? Because while I've seen this, rarely, in individuals. In many cases once you start tracing money the amounts involved in many "die for their beliefs" situations is absurd. Terrorism, for example.

cpursley•3 days ago
What point are you trying to make other than bigotry? Ethic Russians are not the only Eastern Europeans perpetuating cyber crime. Anyways, Nesterenko is a Ukrainian surname - at least get your racism correct.
0xAstro•3 days ago
> Stark Industries Solutions

jarvis, whats the status of my dutch servers

consumer451•3 days ago
When I was learning some homelab stuff, and was setting up pfSense, I was able to see the geos of all the scans/attacks on my home internet IP. I was surprised to see that Netherlands was up there with Russia and China in volume. They all got geo blocked.

What is it about the Netherlands that makes them so attractive to these people?

pocksuppet•1 day ago
Amsterdam is one of the biggest (perhaps the biggest) global internet hubs - European equivalent of North Virginia - and also not a totalitarian country like Germany (otherwise there'd be more in Frankfurt).
Cider9986•3 days ago
That's where the servers are. See all the tor nodes in Netherlands. They aren't actually in the Netherlands.
l23k4•2 days ago
What is this supposed to mean?

Most of the tor nodes in Netherlands are actually physically in Netherlands.

mvdwoord•3 days ago
High bandwidth and (relatively) low sentencing would be my guess..
debarshri•3 days ago
Those who are curious about notorious data centers, please see Cyberbunker [1]. I think conceptually it is cool. Also in the netherlands.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyberBunker

pbgcp2026•2 days ago
I see couple of issues here: > 1) "Netherlands Seizes 800 Servers" - this should not have happened. Full stop. It's not US, UK or even DE. We are losing, people. > 2) They did not turn those into "honey pots". meaning: they did not want a fix. They wanted a show. > 3) I bet it's just a tip of an iceberg. Care to assume how many of those are hosted at "major cloud providers"? Money talks ...
l23k4•2 days ago
> Care to assume how many of those are hosted at "major cloud providers"?

Zero (not a guess)

pbgcp2026•2 days ago
Exhibit 1: GRU-linked Sandworm/APT44 campaigns (2021–2025)
l23k4•2 days ago
None of the servers seized from this small datacenter were hosted at a big cloud provider, they were hosted at the small datacenter and not a big cloud provider.
analog8374•3 days ago
It would be nice if they named/prosecuted the people who paid them to perform the attacks.
dist-epoch•3 days ago
The FSB? What are you going to do about that. Russia shot down an airliner full of Netherlands citizens and there were no repercussions.
parineum•3 days ago
Law enforcement doesn't typically talk about ongoing investigations.
nubinetwork•3 days ago
legacynl•3 days ago
> those sanctions failed to target Stark’s remaining connection to the Internet — an Internet service provider based in the Netherlands called MIRhosting.

The fuck, i walk past the office of mirhosting every day

account42•2 days ago
Now can we also seize some servers for the massive organized DDOS campaign that seems to be plaguing many small hosts lately or are the originators too big for that?
ziofill•3 days ago
Maybe it's because I haven't had my coffee yet, but I swear my brain read: "Neanderthals Seize 800 Servers"
Advertisement
runtime_terror•3 days ago
I'm I the only one that read "Neanderthal Seizes 800 Servers..."?

Would have loved to read that article.